Gauge Transformations: Can G(t,q) be Expressed Differently?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
10 replies · 2K views
dynamicskillingme
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For a gauge function G(t,q) where
gif.gif
,
does
gif.gif
or
gif.gif
have any alternative form or can they be expressed in any other way?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Its a mechanical system, but just working on proofs and theory so
gif.gif


I'm working on proving how different quantities change, such as the euler lagrange equations, the generalised momenta, mechanical energy and power
 
So for example for the euler lagrange I have
gif.gif
 
Oh, so you're just talking about Lagrangian mechanics.

If [itex]G[/itex] is a function of [itex]q[/itex] and [itex]t[/itex], then you have:

[itex]\dot{G} = \frac{\partial G}{\partial q} \dot{q} + \frac{\partial G}{\partial t}[/itex]

So in that case, [itex]\frac{\partial \dot{G}}{\partial \dot{q}} = \frac{\partial G}{\partial q}[/itex]
 
Oh wow, this is painful how much I overlooked that. Thanks!
 
stevendaryl said:
Oh, so you're just talking about Lagrangian mechanics.

If [itex]G[/itex] is a function of [itex]q[/itex] and [itex]t[/itex], then you have:

[itex]\dot{G} = \frac{\partial G}{\partial q} \dot{q} + \frac{\partial G}{\partial t}[/itex]

So in that case, [itex]\frac{\partial \dot{G}}{\partial \dot{q}} = \frac{\partial G}{\partial q}[/itex]

A quick question about the same function, would
l%20G%7D%7B%5Cpartial%20q%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Cpartial%20%5Cdot%7BG%7D%7D%7B%5Cpartial%20q%7D.gif
be a true statement?
 
stevendaryl said:
Yes, if [itex]G[/itex] is only a function of [itex]q[/itex] and [itex]t[/itex].

G is a function of q and t, (G(t,q) to be exact). Could you explain why you can change the order of the derivatives in this case?
 
dynamicskillingme said:
G is a function of q and t, (G(t,q) to be exact). Could you explain why you can change the order of the derivatives in this case?

If you have a function [itex]X(t,q)[/itex]of [itex]q[/itex] and [itex]t[/itex], then [itex]\dot{X} = \frac{d}{dt} X = (\frac{\partial}{\partial t} + \frac{\partial}{\partial q} \frac{dq}{dt}) X = (\frac{\partial}{\partial t} + \frac{\partial}{\partial q} \dot{q}) X[/itex]

So [itex]\dot{G} = \frac{\partial G}{\partial t} + \dot{q} \frac{\partial G}{\partial q}[/itex]. Therefore, [itex]\frac{\partial \dot{G}}{\partial q} = \frac{\partial^2 G}{\partial t \partial q} + \dot{q} \frac{\partial^2 G}{\partial q^2}[/itex].

Similarly, [itex]\frac{d}{dt} \frac{\partial G}{\partial q} = (\frac{\partial}{\partial t} + \frac{\partial}{\partial q} \dot{q}) \frac{\partial G}{\partial q} = \frac{\partial^2 G}{\partial t \partial q} + \frac{\partial^2 G}{\partial q^2} \dot{q}[/itex]
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dynamicskillingme