Geartrain Doubt.... How to select the number of teeth given other specifications

  • Thread starter Thread starter ANSAN
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Doubt Teeth
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the selection of gear teeth numbers for a specific gear pair, given parameters such as power, RPM, gear ratio, helix angle, and pressure angle. Participants explore methods for determining suitable gear teeth counts while considering mechanical constraints and design principles.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the method for selecting gear teeth based on power and other specifications, emphasizing the need for a common module to transmit velocity.
  • Another participant suggests flexibility in the transmission ratio and highlights the importance of considering shaft diameters, gear materials, and dimensional restrictions.
  • Some participants discuss the accuracy required for the gear ratio and the longevity of the gearbox, noting that too few teeth can lead to undercutting and weaker teeth, while too many can result in a heavier gearbox.
  • Several ratios and corresponding tooth counts are proposed, with calculations provided for potential gear pairs that meet the required ratio of approximately 3.613.
  • One participant expresses a desire for guidance on selecting proper gear teeth pairs, specifically questioning the suitability of certain ratios and the implications of having no common factors between gear teeth counts.
  • Another participant explains the concept of "hunting tooth" gears, which do not share common factors, leading to even wear and reduced noise, and suggests alternatives like using an idler gear or a chain for achieving integer gear ratios.
  • Concerns are raised about the trade-offs between minimizing the number of teeth for size and avoiding undercutting while ensuring strength.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the selection of gear teeth, with no consensus reached on a definitive method or specific gear pairs. The discussion includes competing models and approaches, indicating that multiple perspectives remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various factors that could influence gear selection, such as torque calculations, gear strength, and the need for specific design recommendations, but these considerations are not fully resolved within the discussion.

ANSAN
Messages
6
Reaction score
3
TL;DR
Doubt in Gear...!!
Hai all,

I need to get to know how a Gear pair teeth numbers are selected.

Details : Power = 300KW, N1=2950, N2=816.5 , i=3.62, Helix angle = 35deg, Pressure angle = 20deg.

I need to know how to select a Gear pair teeth for this input?

Knowing a gear set should have common Module to transmit velocity.

Is there any method to select Gear teeth w.r.t power to be transmitted?

Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome ANSAN! :cool:

You will need to find some flexibility for that transmission ratio of N2/N1, since matching numbers of teeth is going to prove difficult.
You also need to determine the diameters of your shafts, the material of your gears, any dimensional restrictions of your machine shop, and the physical available space for your lubrication casing.
Then, you will need to follow design recommendations of a good Machinery's Handbook for machine shop.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ANSAN
ANSAN said:
Summary:: Doubt in Gear...!

I need to know how to select a Gear pair teeth for this input?
Hi @ANSAN -- Is this question for schoolwork? Or for a DIY project maybe?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ANSAN
Ratio 2950 / 816.5 = 3.613 so it will requires only a single gear pair.
How accurate must the ratio be?
How long must the gearbox last?

Too few teeth = undercut = weaker teeth. Too many teeth = a big heavy gearbox.
Calculate tooth ratios that are close.
01 : 3.61298224127373 ratio required
pinion : bull gear teeth
15 : 54.19473361910594
16 : 57.80771586037967
17 : 61.42069810165339
18 : 65.03368034292713 ≈ 2*3*3 : 5*13 close ratio, no common factors = hunting tooth.
19 : 68.64666258420085
20 : 72.25964482547458
21 : 75.87262706674831
22 : 79.48560930802204
23 : 83.09859154929578 ≈ 23 : 83 primes
24 : 86.7115737905695
25 : 90.32455603184323
26 : 93.93753827311696
27 : 97.55052051439068
28 : 101.1635027556644
29 : 104.7764849969382
30 : 108.3894672382119
31 : 112.0024494794856 ≈ prime : 7 * 2^n, but big.
32 : 115.6154317207593

Next determine the torque from kW and RPM.
Then strength needed of one tooth.
Then module and width of gear wheel.
N1=2950, N2=816.5 are both positive but a gear pair will reverse so one will become negative.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ANSAN and Lnewqban
Lnewqban said:
Welcome ANSAN! :cool:

You will need to find some flexibility for that transmission ratio of N2/N1, since matching numbers of teeth is going to prove difficult.
You also need to determine the diameters of your shafts, the material of your gears, any dimensional restrictions of your machine shop, and the physical available space for your lubrication casing.
Then, you will need to follow design recommendations of a good Machinery's Handbook for machine shop.

Thanks for your feedback and Guidance, more helpful.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and Lnewqban
berkeman said:
Hi @ANSAN -- Is this question for schoolwork? Or for a DIY project maybe?
Thanks for your feedback, just a DIY.
 
Baluncore said:
Ratio 2950 / 816.5 = 3.613 so it will requires only a single gear pair.
How accurate must the ratio be?
How long must the gearbox last?

Too few teeth = undercut = weaker teeth. Too many teeth = a big heavy gearbox.
Calculate tooth ratios that are close.
01 : 3.61298224127373 ratio required
pinion : bull gear teeth
15 : 54.19473361910594
16 : 57.80771586037967
17 : 61.42069810165339
18 : 65.03368034292713 ≈ 2*3*3 : 5*13 close ratio, no common factors = hunting tooth.
19 : 68.64666258420085
20 : 72.25964482547458
21 : 75.87262706674831
22 : 79.48560930802204
23 : 83.09859154929578 ≈ 23 : 83 primes
24 : 86.7115737905695
25 : 90.32455603184323
26 : 93.93753827311696
27 : 97.55052051439068
28 : 101.1635027556644
29 : 104.7764849969382
30 : 108.3894672382119
31 : 112.0024494794856 ≈ prime : 7 * 2^n, but big.
32 : 115.6154317207593

Next determine the torque from kW and RPM.
Then strength needed of one tooth.
Then module and width of gear wheel.
N1=2950, N2=816.5 are both positive but a gear pair will reverse so one will become negative.
Thanks a lot for your fine reply.
Since iam learning the art of Gearbox, need some guidance in your feedback,

1. How you choose these - 3 Gear teeth pair?
18 : 65.03368034292713 ≈ 2*3*3 : 5*13 close ratio, no common factors = hunting tooth.
since its 18:65, no even numbers, so no hunting gear possible i think.
23 : 83.09859154929578 ≈ 23 : 83 primes
31 : 112.0024494794856 ≈ prime : 7 * 2^n, but big.

Pl. guide for selecting proper Gear teeth pair.
Thanks in advance.
 
The 18:65 ratio is close to what you need. It is a two gear pair.
18 teeth = 2*3*3;
65 teeth = 5*13;
There are no prime factor shared by the two gears.

When two meshed gear wheels do not share a common factor it is said to have a “hunting tooth”. Each and every tooth on one gear hunts out and contacts every tooth on the other gear. That means the teeth wear evenly and there is less noise. Take a look at the tooth counts and ratios found in automobile final drive differential gears.

To obtain an integer gear ratio, and still have a hunting tooth, you can use an idler gear with no common factor, between the two gears. Alternatively, a chain or a stepped belt with the number of links having no common factor with either of the two sprockets.

If the tooth count is high, the individual teeth do not contact very often, but they must all be just as strong. So minimise the number of teeth to make the gears smaller, but avoid undercutting.

31:112 gives a very close ratio, but it is a big and heavy solution.
You can factorise the numbers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
13K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K