Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the Geforce 5900 Ultra 256MB graphics card, focusing on its performance for gaming, particularly in relation to upcoming titles like Doom 3, and comparisons with ATI's offerings. Participants explore technical specifications, user experiences, and concerns regarding compatibility with OpenGL 2.0 and DirectX 9.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Technical explanation
- Exploratory
Main Points Raised
- Some participants express skepticism about the FX 5900's ability to run Doom 3 effectively, citing concerns over its OpenGL 2.0 readiness and performance metrics.
- Others argue that the FX 5900 Ultra is a viable choice for gaming, highlighting its performance in titles like UT2003 and suggesting that it may not be necessary to have the latest card for upcoming games.
- Participants discuss the noise level and physical size of the FX 5900 Ultra, with some claiming it requires two slots and is excessively loud, while others refute this by citing specific models that are quieter and more compact.
- Concerns are raised about the card's support for DirectX 9, with some suggesting that backward compatibility will mitigate potential issues for future games.
- There is a mention of differing experiences with NVIDIA and ATI drivers, with some participants expressing a preference for NVIDIA based on past experiences.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus on the overall performance and suitability of the FX 5900 Ultra for gaming. Multiple competing views exist regarding its capabilities, noise level, and future-proofing against upcoming game requirements.
Contextual Notes
Limitations include varying user experiences with different models of the FX 5900 Ultra, as well as unresolved questions about the performance of the card with future software updates and game releases.