Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

General Relavitiy, P-branes, and time travel.

  1. Dec 28, 2005 #1
    OK, I made another post on this, being too sure of myself that I knew this the answers. This is the wrong thing to do on a forum when everyone else knows more than you :rofl:

    So, I'll try to make it more reasonable this time.

    Doesn't general relativity allow the *theortical* possibility of time travel? I'm not saying it's practical, in fact, some people say the paradoxes (grandfather's paradox, etc) prove that you can not go back into time, or change the past, etc.

    I was just surprised when everyone responded and was so sure it wasn't even theortically possible. Now, don't quote me on this, but I've read several laymans books, (" A brief history of time" by stephen hawking was one) since I don't understand the complicated calculus/physics behind the text books. Now, I'm pretty sure he said it's theorticall possible, right?

    I've always been fasinated by time travel, I know it's probably just a dream, but I know we have so much more to find about the world, so I'm trying to be optimistic here. I mean, look how far we've come in 50 years...
    Now space tourism is emerging!


    OK, here's why I think the laws of physics may allow it:
    Don't some theorties support it? I thought general relativity did? I forgot exactly how (It's been awhile since i've read those books, (^^;;) but I was pretty sure GR was a theory that instead of gravity being an unknown force, gravity was a force that bends spacetime. Therefore, a nearby object in space (a large body, planet, etc) and when a smaller object comes, it will circle around the other planets gravitional field. This is why planets orbit, right?

    Also, I heard of something in quantum physics like B-Branes or something, that may allow it to be pratical.

    I just want to know why everyone here disapproves of it even being a theortical possibility (which I realize is different than being practicail), since I've read about it qutie a bit, and have gotten quite difference answers, but would like some honest answers from a scientific community.

    Thank you :)
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 28, 2005 #2

    Aether

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Here's what would be more reasonable: go to www.arxiv.org and find a scientific paper that teaches something about any scientific topic whatsoever that you are interested in, put in some effort to learn something concrete about the subject, and then come back for a chat about it.

    Papers at www.arxiv.org aren't always as solid as papers published in a peer reviewed journal, or a text book, but they are easily accessible.
     
    Last edited: Dec 28, 2005
  4. Dec 28, 2005 #3
    Here's some stuff I found...
    http://www.wonderquest.com/TimeTravel.htm

    http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/1999/02.18/light.html
    Interesting...
     
  5. Dec 28, 2005 #4

    Ivan Seeking

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    My best understanding is that there are solutions to the equations of General Relativity that appear to allow for time travel, however, practical considerations as well as deeper complications may render time travel impossible. At this time there is no consensus among physicists what the correct answer to all of this may be, but the nay crowd seems to have a larger population than the yay crowd. My opinion is that without a unified theory this is all speculation at best. For all that we know, we may not have even identified all of variables needed for such a theory.

    If any Mentors wish to correct or modify [add to] this statement, please go ahead. If any of our physics gurus wish to comment, please send me a PM. I am closing this to prevent inappropriate speculation.

    Finally, if you want to learn physics, go to school. If you want to explore these issues as a hobby, don't expect to understand them.

    Edit: Oh yes, as I understand things, Mallet used linearized equations for a non-linear field. In other words, he screwed up and used the wrong equations. That's why his time machine - really a "time-telephone" - won't work.
     
    Last edited: Dec 28, 2005
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?



Similar Discussions: General Relavitiy, P-branes, and time travel.
  1. Time Travel (Replies: 15)

  2. Time travel (Replies: 2)

  3. Time Travel (Replies: 7)

  4. Time Travel (Replies: 19)

Loading...