General solution to a 6th order DE

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the sixth-order differential equation (DE) y^(6) + y = 0. The user derived roots as (sqrt3 - i)/2, (sqrt3 + i)/2, i, -i, (-sqrt3 + i)/2, and (-sqrt3 - i)/2, leading to a general solution involving exponential and trigonometric functions. However, discrepancies arise when comparing this solution to a provided answer, which includes terms that appear linearly dependent. The user questions the validity of both solutions and seeks clarification on the derivation process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of sixth-order differential equations
  • Familiarity with complex roots and their implications in DE solutions
  • Knowledge of linear independence in function spaces
  • Proficiency in applying trigonometric identities in differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of solutions for sixth-order differential equations
  • Study linear independence and dependence of solutions in differential equations
  • Learn about the application of complex roots in constructing general solutions
  • Examine the use of trigonometric identities in simplifying DE solutions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying differential equations, and educators looking to deepen their understanding of sixth-order DE solutions and their complexities.

MathewsMD
Messages
430
Reaction score
7
Hi,

Problem: Given the DE: y^(6) + y = 0, find the general solution.

Solution. I found the roots to be: (sqrt3 - i)/2, (sqrt3 + i)/2, i, -i, (-sqrt3 + i)/2, (-sqrt3 - i)/2

Thus, my general solution led to:

y = c1cost + c2sint + c3exp(t/2*(sqrt3))*cos(t/2) + c4exp(t/2*(sqrt3))*sin(t/2) + c5exp(t/2*-(sqrt3))*cos(t/2) + c6exp(t/2*(-sqrt3))*sin(t/2)

I don't see any errors in this, but please let me know if there are.

When I looked at the solution, the answer is:

y = exp(t/2*(sqrt3))*(c1cos(t/2) + c2sin(t/2)) + c3cost + c4sint*exp(t/2*-(sqrt3))*(c5cos(t/2) + c6sin(t/2)

How exactly did they derive the solution? Is my original answer wrong? The solutions in my original answer seem linearly dependent, and I don't quite see how they derived the solution they did...any help is great!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think there's an error in their solution. Notice that they have a cos(t) term but no sin(t) term. You don't get one without the other. You could check your solution, although that's going to be a lot of work.
 
Mark44 said:
I think there's an error in their solution. Notice that they have a cos(t) term but no sin(t) term. You don't get one without the other. You could check your solution, although that's going to be a lot of work.

Yes, exactly! I just wasn't sure if they used a trig identity of sorts to find linear dependency or not b/w the terms.
It also seems odd (I may be mistaken) that they included c4 and c5 and c6 in their solution despite those terms being multiplied to yield only 2 terms, making the extra constant factor redundant, no?
Regardless, thank you for your comment.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K