Is anyone here familiar with the proof (using homology) of the generalized Jordan curve theorem, that a subspace of S^n homeomorphic to S^(n-1) divides it into two components? It can be found on page 169 of Hatcher's algebraic topology book, which can be downloaded from http://www.math.cornell.edu/~hatcher/AT/ATpage.html" [Broken] page.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I'm wondering if it's possible to use the same kind of proof to show that a general (n-1)-manifold divides S^n into two components. It was shown that the complement of an n-1-sphere in S^n actually has the homology of S^0, which is much stronger, and won't hold for general n-1-manifolds. But all I need is that the 0th reduced homology group is Z, which does seem to be true. The problem is that the corresponding terms of the Mayer-vietoris sequence used in Hatcher's proof aren't zero where they need to be. Does anyone have any ideas?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Generalized jordan curve theorem

Loading...

Similar Threads - Generalized jordan curve | Date |
---|---|

A What separates Hilbert space from other spaces? | Jan 15, 2018 |

A Galois theorem in general algebraic extensions | Apr 29, 2017 |

I Generalizing the definition of a subgroup | Feb 20, 2017 |

Jordan Normal Form & Generalized Eigenvectors | Apr 17, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**