Generalized Schrödinger equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Generalized Schrödinger equation as presented in Prof. Susskind's Quantum Mechanics lectures. Participants analyze the differentiation of the wave function's eigenvector coefficients with respect to time, specifically addressing the role of the exponential term e^(-iEt). It is concluded that this term is essential for capturing the time dependence of the coefficients, and that conflating e^(-iEt) into the notation for alpha is valid despite its non-constant nature.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the Schrödinger equation
  • Knowledge of eigenvectors and eigenvalues
  • Basic calculus, particularly differentiation of exponential functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Generalized Schrödinger equation
  • Learn about the significance of eigenvalues in Quantum Mechanics
  • Explore the implications of time-dependent wave functions
  • Investigate the role of complex exponentials in quantum states
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on Quantum Mechanics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to wave functions and their time evolution.

Maximise24
Messages
33
Reaction score
1
This equation (see attachment) appears in one of Prof. Susskinds's lectures on Quantum Mechanics: in trying to differentiate the coefficients of the eigenvectors of a wave function with respect to time, an exponential e^(-iEt) is introduced for alpha.

I can see that d/dt e^(-iEt) = -iE e^(-iEt), but why is the second part e^(-iEt) not in the top equation in the attachment? Is it disregarded because it's just a number?

Thanks for any help provided!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Attachment seems to have got lost.
 

Attachments

  • QM.jpg
    QM.jpg
    14.6 KB · Views: 535
But the exponential is there, disguised under the form of 'alpha' in the rhs.
 
OK, so \alphaj(0)e-iEt has simply been conflated into \alphaj? Can you just do that since e-iEt is not a constant?
Thanks!
 
The only variable is time. e^{-iEt} in units with hbar=1 gathers the time dependence of alpha.
 
Maximise24 said:
OK, so \alphaj(0)e-iEt has simply been conflated into \alphaj? Can you just do that since e-iEt is not a constant?
Thanks!

Aj is defined on the second line of your picture. It doesn't look like a constant to me.:smile:
 
OK, thanks guys.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K