Geodesics Around Black Holes: Do They Form Closed Loops?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of light around black holes, specifically whether geodesics form closed loops. Participants clarify that while light can orbit a black hole at a distance of 1.5 times the Schwarzschild radius (event horizon), these orbits are unstable. The Kerr solution introduces closed null curves, which are considered unphysical artifacts rather than stable orbits. Key references include "The Geometry of Kerr Holes" by Barrett O'Neill and "The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes" by Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity and its implications on space-time.
  • Familiarity with black hole terminology, including event horizon and Schwarzschild radius.
  • Knowledge of the Kerr solution and its significance in black hole physics.
  • Basic grasp of geodesics and their role in gravitational fields.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Kerr solution in detail.
  • Explore the concept of unstable circular orbits around black holes.
  • Investigate the implications of closed null curves in theoretical physics.
  • Read "The Geometry of Kerr Holes" and "The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes" for in-depth understanding.
USEFUL FOR

Astrophysicists, theoretical physicists, and students of general relativity interested in the dynamics of light and geodesics around black holes.

ObsessiveMathsFreak
Messages
404
Reaction score
8
Light cannot escape from black holes, hence their name.

But Since light has the same speed everywhere does that mean that the space/time geodesics in and around black holes are closed loops?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My understanding of black holes is that photons travellining in the right trajectory would be caught by the massive gravity of the black hole and orbit the black hole perpetually. This is known as a photon sphere, but I'm sure is just theory.
 
well the light should just fall into the singularity, but then again i may be confused on the actual scenario.
 
At a distance of

\frac{3 G M}{c^2}

light can orbit a black hole, though unstably, as Ambi said.

- Warren
 
unstably because if its distance changes at all, then the force of gravity changes with it and the orbit either becomes a fall or an escape?
 
Originally posted by franznietzsche
unstably because if its distance changes at all, then the force of gravity changes with it and the orbit either becomes a fall or an escape?
You got it. You'd have to have pretty good aim with your laser! :smile:

- Warren
 
Originally posted by chroot
You got it. You'd have to have pretty good aim with your laser! :smile:

- Warren

lol

edit: just realized something, the point at which it orbits exactly is in fact the event horizon is it not?
 
Originally posted by franznietzsche
edit: just realized something, the point at which it orbits exactly is in fact the event horizon is it not?
No, light can orbit at exactly 1.5 times the event horizon radius.

The event horizon exists at the "Schwarzschild radius,"

r_s = \frac{2 GM}{c^2}

- Warren
 
oh, ok.
 
  • #10
Closed null curves and two reference books

Hi, OMF,

ObsessiveMathsFreak said:
Since light has the same speed everywhere does that mean that the space/time geodesics in and around black holes are closed loops?

I'd add to what the others told you a possibly confusing and distracting comment: deep inside the Kerr solution, well hidden from outside viewers by the event horizon, lie closed null curves. These are generally thought to be unphysical and to represent a mathematical artifact of the symmetry of the Kerr vacuum (while the exterior field on the other hand is thought to be in some sense the "preferred state" of the exterior; according to gtr, an isolated black hole will radiate away any deviations from the Kerr geometry in the form of gravitational radiation).

These CNCs are truly closed curves; don't confuse them with the "unstable circular orbits" in the exterior region, which are spiral-shaped null geodesics.

Two excellent books which offer extensive discussions of geodesics in the Kerr solution are The Geometry of Kerr Holes, by Barrett O'Neill, and The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes by Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar.

Chris Hillman
 
  • #11
edit: just realized something, the point at which it orbits exactly is in fact the event horizon is it not?
There's an easy heuristic reason, I think: if you inserted a mirror into the orbit, then the light could be deflected, and thus escape the black hole. So, the orbit has to be outside of the event horizon.
 
  • #12
franznietzsche said:
well the light should just fall into the singularity, but then again i may be confused on the actual scenario.

Sort of - it depends on whether your photon gets within the event horizon or not.

According to general relativity, massive objects cause space-time to warp in such a way that other objects (including photons) are pulled towards them, so a photon passing close to a black hole will always have its path deflected towards the hole. If you send a photon past with just the right trajectory at just the right distance from the hole, then its path should curve around the black hole and into an orbit (just like getting a satellite to orbit the earth, except that with a satellite we have the advantage of being able to use boosters to continuously fine-tune its position and keep it in orbit).

Inside the event horizon of a black hole the curvature is so strong that the escape velocity is higher than the speed of light and therefore any photon caught in there will spiral inwards towards the singularity.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
913
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K