Geometric Progression Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter crays
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Geometric
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a geometric progression related to the population growth of Ubris from 1995 to 2000, with specific questions about future population estimates and the year it will reach a certain threshold.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the appropriate indexing for years in the context of the geometric progression formula. There is debate over whether to start counting years from 0 or 1 and how this affects the calculations. Some participants express uncertainty about the implications of their choices.

Discussion Status

There are multiple interpretations regarding the starting point for the year count, with some participants providing different perspectives on how to define the terms in the geometric progression. Guidance has been offered on the formula to use, but no consensus has been reached on the indexing issue.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the implications of their assumptions about the starting year and how it affects the calculations for the geometric progression. There is a focus on ensuring clarity in the definitions used for the terms in the sequence.

crays
Messages
160
Reaction score
0
Hi. Tried solving, but no idea how.

At the end of 1995, the population of Ubris was 46650 and by the end of 2000 it had risen to 54200. On the assumption that the population at the end of each year form a g.p. find

a) The population at the end of 2006, leaving your answer in 3 s.f.

b) The year in which the population reaches 100000, correct to nearest integer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This equation will help you

[tex]T_n=ar^{n-1}[/tex]

in 1995 n=0, in 2000 what does n=?

you can solve now
 
but how sure are you that 1995 is the starting year @_@ ?

Well i got the answer correct with that eqn. But can you briefly explain why must i use n = 12 instead of n = 11 for question a ?
 
Last edited:
You can arbitrarily set the starting year; it will just be a shift. The GP will hold throughout. i.e. a could well be [tex]a = br^{k}[/tex], where b and k are constants. So the GP is simply just transformed to a higher 'starting point'
 
Thanks
 
You must use n = 12 as at the starting year 1995, n = 1 since its the first term in the G.P. that has been defined.
 
There is nothing wrong with using n= 0 for 1995 and then, if you are using [itex]T_n= ar^{n-1}[/itex] your first equation is [itex]ar^{-1}= 46650[/itex]. Or use n= 1 so you have [itex]ar^0= a= 46650[/itex]. If you are using [itex]br^k[/itex], taking k= 0 for 1995 gives [itex]br^0= b= 46650[/itex] and k= 1 [itex]br^1= br= 46650[/itex]. You just get different values of a or b, and r. But where did you get "n= 12"? It is only 5 years from "the end of 1995" to "the end of 2000". If your are taking 1995 to be n= 0, 2000 will be n= 5. If you are taking 1995 to be n= 1, 2000 will be n= 6.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K