Geometric transformation of E field to B ?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the geometric transformation of the electric field (E field) to the magnetic field (B field) as described by Maxwell's equations. When a test charge is stationary, it generates an E field with zero curl, but motion introduces a circulating B field. This relationship is fundamentally explained through the principles of relativity, as presented in the textbook "Electricity and Magnetism" by Purcell. Additionally, Griffiths' "Introduction to Electrodynamics" also addresses this transformation, particularly in chapter 12.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell's equations
  • Familiarity with the principles of relativity
  • Knowledge of electric and magnetic fields
  • Basic calculus concepts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Maxwell's equations in detail
  • Read "Electricity and Magnetism" by Purcell
  • Examine chapter 12 of "Introduction to Electrodynamics" by Griffiths
  • Explore the geometric interpretation of electromagnetic fields
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying electromagnetism, educators teaching advanced physics concepts, and researchers exploring the relationship between electric and magnetic fields.

Ghost117
Messages
50
Reaction score
3
When a test charge is stationary, it generates an E field with zero curl.

When it moves, it generates a circulating magnetic field B...( as well as the E field.)

Is there a geometric reason for this? How does motion alone generate a circulating field B?

Can we call this change a 'transformation' even?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By moving an electric field, you are changing the electric field. A changing electric field is essentially a magnetic field.

Not sure how much calculus you know, but this is very well-understood. The relationship is described in Maxwell's equations.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell's_equations
 
Ghost117 said:
Is there a geometric reason for this? How does motion alone generate a circulating field B?

The fundamental reason is relativity. The textbook by Purcell, Electricity and Magnetism, is the classic presentation of this. For a similar presentation, see section 23.2 of my book Light and Matter: http://lightandmatter.com/lm/ .
 
bcrowell said:
The fundamental reason is relativity. The textbook by Purcell, Electricity and Magnetism, is the classic presentation of this. For a similar presentation, see section 23.2 of my book Light and Matter: http://lightandmatter.com/lm/ .

Thanks much, that's what I needed i.e. a text that deals with this. I'm working through Griffiths E&M right now and I don't think he deals with it.
 
According to numerous posts on PF, Griffiths does cover this topic in a manner similar to Purcell.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DuckAmuck
marcusl said:
According to numerous posts on PF, Griffiths does cover this topic in a manner similar to Purcell.

It's not in chapter 5, maybe chapter 12 which introduces relativity.
 
Ghost117 said:
It's not in chapter 5, maybe chapter 12 which introduces relativity.

p.s. By the way, it is in Griffiths chapter 12, pretty much the last section of the last chapter, has a section on the transformation from E to B. However, I think bcrowell was referring to purcell because that would deal with it in more depth.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
657