High School Geometries of the Universe: What are the Most Accepted Models?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Allen_Wolf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Universe
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The most widely accepted models of the universe's geometry include Euclidean geometry, which describes flat space, and non-Euclidean geometries such as elliptical geometry (Riemann geometry), which accounts for curved space. The current best-fit model for the universe's spacetime geometry is an expanding universe characterized by flat spatial slices of constant comoving time. While measurements indicate a high probability of flat geometry, there remains a small possibility that the spatial geometry could be a 3-sphere or an open "3-hyperbolic" geometry, both with an extremely large radius of curvature.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Euclidean geometry principles
  • Familiarity with non-Euclidean geometries, specifically Riemann geometry
  • Knowledge of cosmological models and spacetime concepts
  • Basic grasp of measurements in cosmology and their implications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of flat vs. curved geometries in cosmology
  • Study the principles of Riemann geometry and its applications in physics
  • Explore the concept of comoving time in cosmological models
  • Investigate current measurement techniques in cosmology and their accuracy
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, cosmologists, and anyone interested in understanding the geometric models that describe the universe.

Allen_Wolf
Messages
48
Reaction score
4
What are the most widely accepted geometries of the universe?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Euclidean geometry (that's the one where we learn about area of shapes, sectors, etc.). Then you have the non-Euclidean geometries like elliptical geometry (Riemann geometry), which describes curved space.
 
Allen_Wolf said:
What are the most widely accepted geometries of the universe?

I'm not sure what you mean by this. We have one current best-fit model for the spacetime geometry of the universe: it's an expanding universe with spatial slices of constant comoving time that are flat (Euclidean). The error bars in measurements still allow a small chance that the spatial geometry of slices of constant comoving time is a 3-sphere or an open "3-hyperbolic" geometry, either way with an extremely large radius of curvature (i.e., very close to flat). Is that what you're asking about?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K