MHB Geometry in the Art of Dorothea Rockburne

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gord1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Art Geometry
AI Thread Summary
Dorothea Rockburne's artwork incorporates mathematical concepts, particularly geometry, which can be linked to the Golden Ratio. The discussion highlights the challenge of interpreting the mathematical equations represented in her art. The participant seeks assistance in understanding the specific equations in Rockburne's work while being familiar with foundational concepts from artists like Da Vinci and M.C. Escher. The conversation emphasizes the intersection of art and mathematics, particularly in the context of Rockburne's unique style. Engaging with these mathematical principles can deepen the appreciation of her artistic expression.
Gord1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello All,

I am an artist who is just beginning to learn how to think mathematically. Have studied the basics "The Golden Standard", Da Vinci, MC Esher. View attachment 6293View attachment 6293 Given my interest, I was introduced to the work of the Dorothea Rockburne and given this work to critique. While I can do the all the art and social analyst of the work, I do not know what equation she is expressing in the attached work. Any assistance would be very much appreciated.

Cheers,

Gord
 

Attachments

  • Dorothea Rockburne's Uriel - Image .jpg
    Dorothea Rockburne's Uriel - Image .jpg
    19.4 KB · Views: 89
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top