Should I take Photonics II or focus on Fields and Geometry III?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bartieshaw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photonic
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the decision of whether to take a course in Photonics II or focus on Fields and Geometry III, particularly in the context of pursuing a degree in theoretical or mathematical physics. Participants explore the relevance and importance of each course to the participant's academic and career goals.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a lack of interest in photonics and questions the necessity of taking Photonics II, given that it is not essential for their intended path in theoretical or mathematical physics.
  • Another participant suggests that those focused on mathematics can easily grasp the material in Photonics II and advises prioritizing fundamental courses over applied ones.
  • Some participants note that Photonics II seems more suited for experimental physicists, while Fields and Geometry III may align better with the interests of someone pursuing mathematical physics.
  • There is a discussion about the content of Fields and Geometry III, with references to abstract algebra and differential geometry, and questions about the course syllabus and textbooks used.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of not skipping lectures in a core course, suggesting that attending all relevant lectures is crucial for academic success.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on the nature of the Fields and Geometry III course, indicating that it may cover topics like vector fields and projective geometry.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the value of Photonics II versus Fields and Geometry III, with no consensus reached on which course is more beneficial for the participant's goals. Some advocate for the mathematical focus, while others highlight the practical applications of photonics.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the decision may depend on individual academic goals, the structure of their degree programs, and the specific content of the courses, which remains somewhat unclear.

bartieshaw
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
Hi

Hi

Im undergrad physics hoping to go into theoretical or mathematical physics. The course Photonics II clashes with one of my math courses Fields and Geometry III and I am told by my course advisor it isn't essential.

I don't mind doing missing a lecture a week of my maths course to do the photonics course if it will be useful or important given where i want to go, but i would prefer not to.

the course description says

"This course will introduce students to the fundamental physics of modern optical and photonic technology. Optical fibres and waveguides. Fundamental properties of light. Electron energy bands in semiconductors and the implications of direct and indirect bandgaps. Light emitting and laser diodes and LEDs. Excitons. Quantum confinement including quantum dots, wires and wells. Characteristics of Bragg gratings. Practical work in polarisation of light, laser diodes, modes of lasers and interferometers, optical fibres."


im not interested at all in photonics or optics, but my degree page says its recommended, so i was just wondering if anyone here thought this course is worthe the hassle of missing my math lectures...


cheers for any thoughts

bart
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you are into maths you can pick up this level of photonics easily.

I would generally say always take the most fundamental courses, learn the other stuff when and if you ever need it.
From personal experience I would also advise against skipping lectures on one course that clashes with another. Go to the extra lectures that you can out of interest if you want but don't sign up for the course as a credit.
 
Sounds like the Lasers course at my school. That class is definitely for the experimental and applied physicist.

If you're wanting mathematical physics, then mgb_phys is probably correct with going with Fields and Geometry 3. That's a weird sounding class to me. Can I ask what your book is and what your syllabus is?

At my school we have abstract algebra and differential geometry classes. Is it a mix of those? So I guess you're going over basic field theory probably with ring theory and some differential geometry?

Remember, mathematical physics is in a math department, and that means passing the graduate math quals in graduate school - if you're in the US, I don't know how everyone else does it.
 
math_owen said:
That's a weird sounding class to me.

I'm guessing that "fields" refers not to stuff like rings and fields, but to stuff like vector fields, i.e., cross sections of bundles.
 
math_owen said:
Sounds like the Lasers course at my school. That class is definitely for the experimental and applied physicist.

If you're wanting mathematical physics, then mgb_phys is probably correct with going with Fields and Geometry 3. That's a weird sounding class to me. Can I ask what your book is and what your syllabus is?

At my school we have abstract algebra and differential geometry classes. Is it a mix of those? So I guess you're going over basic field theory probably with ring theory and some differential geometry?

Remember, mathematical physics is in a math department, and that means passing the graduate math quals in graduate school - if you're in the US, I don't know how everyone else does it.

First off, cheers for you responses, i was worried i had made my question too specific...

The class is a follow on from the class I am doing now Groups and Rings III. here's a description.

"At the end of this course students should:

have a knowledge of the structure of finite fields and be able to perform basic calculations in finite fields.
understand the ideas in projective geometry, and how projective geometry relates to Euclidean geometry.
have enough tools to study objects and transformations in projective planes corresponding to fields.

Course Content:

Fields: fields, polynomials rings, extensions of fields; automorphisms of fields, the structure of a finite field.
Projective Geometry: projective planes, homogeneous coordinates, field planes, collineations of projective planes, conics in field planes, projective geometry of general dimension."

no one at my school seems keen to recommend a single book, but here's a list of reference books they publish for the course

"J.R Durbin Modern Algebra - An Introduction
J.B. Fraleigh A first course in abstract algebra
A. Buetelspacher and U. Rosenbaum Projective geometry: from foundations to applications
H.S.M. Coexter Projective Geometry"


Differential Geometry is a level IV class but most people i know who are doing it are taking it as part of their Honours program and that is probably what i will do.

Though i don't intend to do my graduate studies here, but at my school the mathematical physics program is run by the physics department (much to the disgust of the maths dept.), though i do know of one student doing his Phd through the maths school in Mathematical Physics...
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
904
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K