MHB Getting ready for the final, don't understand how to answer these

  • Thread starter Thread starter chriskeller1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Final
chriskeller1
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Please please urgent help needed with questions like these

How do I predict how big the sample needs to be?

View attachment 3688
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-12-15 at 10.20.37 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-12-15 at 10.20.37 AM.png
    27.4 KB · Views: 77
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Regarding confidence intervals for one mean or proportion, we are given that the maximum error $E$ of the estimate for $\mu$ is:

$$E=z_{\alpha/2}\cdot\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}$$

So, by what factor must $n$ increase so that $E$ is one-fifth as large?
 
MarkFL said:
Regarding confidence intervals for one mean or proportion, we are given that the maximum error $E$ of the estimate for $\mu$ is:

$$E=z_{\alpha/2}\cdot\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}$$

So, by what factor must $n$ increase so that $E$ is one-fifth as large?
n must be 5000 right?
 
chriskeller1 said:
n must be 5000 right?

Yes, because $n$ is under a radical, it must increase by a factor of $5^2=25$ in order for $E$ to be 1/5 as large. and so we find:

$$200\cdot25=5000$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top