MHB Getting ready for the final, don't understand how to answer these

  • Thread starter Thread starter chriskeller1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Final
AI Thread Summary
To determine the necessary sample size for reducing the maximum error $E$ of an estimate for the mean $\mu$ to one-fifth its original size, the sample size $n$ must increase by a factor of 25. This is due to the relationship where $E$ is inversely proportional to the square root of $n$. Given the formula $E=z_{\alpha/2}\cdot\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}$, if the original sample size is 200, the new required sample size would be 5000. Thus, the calculation confirms that to achieve this reduction in error, the sample size must indeed be 5000. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately estimating confidence intervals.
chriskeller1
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Please please urgent help needed with questions like these

How do I predict how big the sample needs to be?

View attachment 3688
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-12-15 at 10.20.37 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-12-15 at 10.20.37 AM.png
    27.4 KB · Views: 78
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Regarding confidence intervals for one mean or proportion, we are given that the maximum error $E$ of the estimate for $\mu$ is:

$$E=z_{\alpha/2}\cdot\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}$$

So, by what factor must $n$ increase so that $E$ is one-fifth as large?
 
MarkFL said:
Regarding confidence intervals for one mean or proportion, we are given that the maximum error $E$ of the estimate for $\mu$ is:

$$E=z_{\alpha/2}\cdot\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}$$

So, by what factor must $n$ increase so that $E$ is one-fifth as large?
n must be 5000 right?
 
chriskeller1 said:
n must be 5000 right?

Yes, because $n$ is under a radical, it must increase by a factor of $5^2=25$ in order for $E$ to be 1/5 as large. and so we find:

$$200\cdot25=5000$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top