Undergrad Getting to Grips with Rank-2 Tensors

  • Thread starter Thread starter Silviu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tensors
Click For Summary
Rank-2 tensors can be represented by matrices, but their classification as (2,0), (0,2), or (1,1) depends on the types of objects they act upon, such as vectors or one-forms. The distinction between these forms is not evident from the matrix representation alone, as both can appear the same numerically. The electromagnetic field strength tensor can be expressed in both (2,0) and (0,2) forms, depending on whether it acts on vectors or one-forms. Understanding the context of use is crucial, as it determines the appropriate representation of the tensor. Overall, matrix notation is limited compared to tensor notation, which provides a more comprehensive framework for understanding these mathematical objects.
Silviu
Messages
612
Reaction score
11
Hello! I am reading about tensors and I am a bit confused about rank-2 tensors. From what I understand they can be represented by a matrix. However I am not sure I understand the difference between (2,0), (0,2) and (1,1) tensors. I understand that they act on different objects (vectors or one forms or both) but having a matrix, how can u know what kind of tensor it is? Also, for example I saw definitions of electromagnetic field strength tensor written both as (2,0) and (0,2) tensor and I am not sure I understand the difference. What would be the 2 vectors it can act on and what would be the 2 one-forms it can act on, and how do we know when to use the right form?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Silviu said:
Hello! I am reading about tensors and I am a bit confused about rank-2 tensors. From what I understand they can be represented by a matrix.
Yes. This assumes, however, the choice of some basis, according to which the matrix entries are the coordinates.
However I am not sure I understand the difference between (2,0), (0,2) and (1,1) tensors.
It's the same as between ##f : U^* \times V^* \rightarrow \mathbb{F}\, , \,f : U \times V \rightarrow \mathbb{F}\, , \,f: U^* \times V \rightarrow \mathbb{F}##.
I understand that they act on different objects (vectors or one forms or both) ...
Yes.
... but having a matrix, ...
requires a basis of both ...
how can u know what kind of tensor it is?
You can't. How can you tell, whether ##(1,2)## is a vector, a linear function ##f : \mathbb{R}^2 \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\, , \,x \mapsto \langle (1,2),x\rangle## or simply a point in the Euclidean plane? Or a lattice point?
Also, for example I saw definitions of electromagnetic field strength tensor written both as (2,0) and (0,2) tensor and I am not sure I understand the difference.
As ##V^* \cong V## the difference is, whether ##(1,2) \in V## or ##(x \mapsto \langle (1,2),x \rangle) \in V^*##. Both are represented by ##(1,2)##.
What would be the 2 vectors it can act on and what would be the 2 one-forms it can act on, and how do we know when to use the right form?
It simply depends on what you want the matrix ##M## to represent. You have ##f(u,v)= u^tMv## and from which vector spaces ##u## and ##v## are, depends on what you want to do.
 
Silviu said:
Hello! I am reading about tensors and I am a bit confused about rank-2 tensors. From what I understand they can be represented by a matrix. However I am not sure I understand the difference between (2,0), (0,2) and (1,1) tensors. I understand that they act on different objects (vectors or one forms or both) but having a matrix, how can u know what kind of tensor it is? Also, for example I saw definitions of electromagnetic field strength tensor written both as (2,0) and (0,2) tensor and I am not sure I understand the difference. What would be the 2 vectors it can act on and what would be the 2 one-forms it can act on, and how do we know when to use the right form?

Matrix notion is simply not as powerful as tensor notation. It may be helpful, though, to regard tensor vectors as matrix column vectors, and tensor one-forms as matrix row vectors. Then the the product of a row and column vector yields a scalar, which is what a vector and a one form written in tensor notation do.

Then the typical matrix is a linear map from a column vector to a column vector. You can also regard it as a map from a row vector to a row vector, though this is less common.

Maps from vectors to one forms, and one-forms to vectors exist in tensor notation (the metric tensor is one example of this). But it doesn't really have a direct ananlogy in matrix form, though the metric tensor ##g_{\mu\nu}## is sometimes written to appear as a matrix.
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
778
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
854
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K