I Getting zeros and poles for Laplace transform

bnich
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Getting zero's and poles for Laplace transform of damped cosine
I'm following the intuition behind getting the zero's and poles of a damped cosine function with this video


At around 11:50, he shows some graphics pertaining to multiplying the probing function with the impulse response, but the graphics don't seem correct.

For example, in the B+B' graphic, the probing function exactly equals the impulse response, but should the probing function be the inverse of the impulse response in order for the sum to be "just barely infinite" as depicted in the screenshot
laplace.png

Image source: http://www.dspguide.com/CH32.PDF

And for the D graphic, the complex part should be zero, but shouldn't the real part of the exponential be the same as where the poles are? Image below describes what I think it should be
Screenshot 2024-02-02 at 3.55.40 PM.png

image source: https://www.dummies.com/article/tec...s-understanding-poles-and-zeros-of-fs-166275/

Thanks for your time. I look forward to hearing some feedback!
 
Thread 'Direction Fields and Isoclines'
I sketched the isoclines for $$ m=-1,0,1,2 $$. Since both $$ \frac{dy}{dx} $$ and $$ D_{y} \frac{dy}{dx} $$ are continuous on the square region R defined by $$ -4\leq x \leq 4, -4 \leq y \leq 4 $$ the existence and uniqueness theorem guarantees that if we pick a point in the interior that lies on an isocline there will be a unique differentiable function (solution) passing through that point. I understand that a solution exists but I unsure how to actually sketch it. For example, consider a...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Back
Top