Given Point (-2, 3pi) need to find r>0 , -2pi< or equal to theta < 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jurrasic
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point Theta
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on converting the polar coordinate (-2, 3π) to a valid representation within the specified range for θ. The correct answer is (2, -2π), which arises from the need to express the radius as a positive value and adjust the angle accordingly. The confusion stems from the interpretation of the angle 3π, which exceeds the allowed range of -2π ≤ θ < 0. The explanation clarifies that moving 3π radians anticlockwise from the origin and then walking backwards 2 units leads to the Cartesian point (2, 0), consistent with the alternative representation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polar coordinates and their conversion to Cartesian coordinates
  • Familiarity with angular measurements in radians
  • Knowledge of the properties of periodic functions, specifically sine and cosine
  • Basic trigonometry, including rotation and direction in the coordinate plane
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the conversion of polar coordinates to Cartesian coordinates in detail
  • Learn about the periodic nature of trigonometric functions and their implications for angle measurement
  • Explore the concept of angle normalization within specified ranges
  • Review video resources on polar coordinates, such as those available on Khan Academy
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on trigonometry and coordinate geometry, will benefit from this discussion. It is also relevant for anyone seeking to understand the nuances of polar coordinate representation and conversion.

Jurrasic
Messages
98
Reaction score
0
question is (-2, 3pi)
they want to find r>0 , -2pi< or equal to theta < 0

Isn't it just (-2 , pi)
because you subtract 2pi from 3pi don't you? But the book says the answer is (2, -2pi) What in the world?

The 2 in the actual correct answer is because of how polar coordinates are plotted it changed to a positive as a result. But the -2pi part instead of being pi, is not clear?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, as pi does not fall within the inequality. You can take a further 2pi away though, but this doesn't give a positive value for r. So, if you make r = 2 and not -2, how far has it rotated around the axis?
 
Think of it like this. The original point is (-2, 3pi). If I were to lead you to that point from the origin, I would say, turn 3pi (1 and 1/2 rotations anticlockwise, so now you are facing the opposite direction), and then walk backwards -2 steps. (This takes you to the cartesian point (2,0)

They are expressing this as turning clockwise 2pi, so you make a full rotation but are still facing the same direction, and then walk 2 steps forward. This also takes you to the cartesian point (2,0)

The resulting location is the same.

You might find this selection of videos most helpful:
http://www.khanacademy.org/v/polar-coordinates-1?p=Trigonometry
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K