Gluon Scattering - Colored Feynman Rules for Yang Mills Theory

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of colored Feynman rules for Yang-Mills theory, specifically addressing the normalization of the structure constants \( f^{abc} \) and the trace relations involving SU(N) generators. The normalization condition \( \text{tr}(T^a T^b) = \frac{1}{2}\delta^{ab} \) leads to the conclusion that \( f^{ab e} f^{cd e} = -2 \text{tr}([T^a, T^b][T^c, T^d]) \), contradicting a claim of an additional factor of 4. Participants confirm that the correct factor is indeed 2, as demonstrated through specific examples. The discussion also touches on the relationship between momentum variables in scattering amplitudes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of SU(N) algebra and its generators
  • Familiarity with trace operations in quantum field theory
  • Knowledge of Feynman rules and scattering amplitudes
  • Basic concepts of Yang-Mills theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of colored Feynman rules in Yang-Mills theory
  • Explore the implications of different normalization conventions for structure constants
  • Investigate the relationship between momentum variables in scattering processes
  • Review examples of trace calculations involving SU(N) generators
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, particle physics, and anyone working on Yang-Mills theory and scattering processes.

maverick280857
Messages
1,774
Reaction score
5
Hi,

I'm reading Appendix 1 of Section N2 (Gluon Scattering) in "Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell" by Anthony Zee. The generators for SU(N) have the usual algebra

[tex][T^a, T^b] = i \epsilon^{a b c}T^c[/tex]

Suppose we adopt the following normalization

[tex]\text{tr}(T^a T^b) = \frac{1}{2}\delta^{a b}[/tex]

Then, we have

[tex]\text{tr}([T^a, T^b]T^c) = \text{tr}(i f^{a b e} T^{e} T^{c}) = i f^{a b e}\text{tr}(T^e T^c) = \frac{i f^{a b e} \delta^{e c}}{2} = \frac{i f ^{a b c}}{2}[/tex]

so that

[tex]f^{a b c} = - 2 i \text{tr}([T^a, T^b]T^c)[/tex]

Also,

[tex]\text{tr}([T^a, T^b][T^c, T^d]) = \text{tr}(i f^{a b \alpha} T^{\alpha} i f ^{c d \beta} T^{\beta}) = -f^{a b \alpha} f^{c d \beta}\text{tr}(T^\alpha T^\beta) = -\frac{1}{2}f^{a b e} f^{c d e}[/tex]

which implies that

[tex]f^{a b e} f^{c d e} = -2 \text{tr}([T^a, T^b][T^c, T^d])[/tex]

However, the author explicitly states that

[tex]f^{a b e} f^{c d e} = -4 \text{tr}([T^a, T^b][T^c, T^d])[/tex]

I don't get this additional factor of 2. What am I missing? Is there an error somewhere?

Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Right on, the factor should be 2, not 4. For example check it for a = c = 1, b = d = 2. You get

f123f123 = 2 tr(T3T3)

The LHS is 1 and the trace of (T3)2 is indeed 1/2, so your form is correct.
 
Thanks Bill.

How is

[tex]\frac{\langle 1 2\rangle^4}{\langle 1 2\rangle \langle 2 3\rangle \langle 3 4\rangle \langle 4 1\rangle} = \frac{p_1 \cdot p_2}{p_2 \cdot p_3}[/tex]?

For a given set of momenta, doesn't one have to find out what <1|2>, <3|4> etc are explicitly? How does this simple relationship arise? I think I missed it somehow. I can't get the LHS to equal the RHS. Any ideas?

Normally, papers/books seem to derive it up to the LHS..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K