God's Simple Energy is One Spectrum

  • Thread starter Thread starter logastro
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Spectrum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the controversial theory proposed by a user named Logastro, which claims that gravity is a form of sound reflection and that electromagnetic waves are merely manifestations of sound waves. Participants debate the validity of this theory, emphasizing that sound cannot travel through the vacuum of space, thus challenging Logastro's assertions. Key points include the distinction between scientific hypotheses and established theories, with several users advocating for adherence to the scientific method as a means to validate or invalidate claims. The conversation highlights the importance of critical thinking and evidence-based reasoning in scientific discourse.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly sound waves and gravity.
  • Familiarity with the scientific method and its application in validating theories.
  • Knowledge of electromagnetic waves and their properties.
  • Awareness of the limitations of sound transmission in a vacuum.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of sound waves and their behavior in different mediums.
  • Study the scientific method and its role in hypothesis testing and theory validation.
  • Explore the relationship between electromagnetic waves and gravity in modern physics.
  • Investigate the principles of energy transfer in chemical reactions, focusing on heat, light, and sound.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, science educators, students of physics, and anyone interested in the intersection of sound, gravity, and electromagnetic theory.

  • #31
Originally posted by logastro
but ... , ... , the occult , what the ,?, that stuffs whichcraft , stay away from that man - you , John Edwards and your occultic ways shall go wanting

The occult has taught for thousands of years that the universe was made up of energy vibrations. Now science seems to match these occult teachings.


See this extensive article which explains the wave structure of matter. http://www.quantummatter.com/mwolff/body_point.html


Also, See this related thread.

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?s=&threadid=13768&perpage=12&pagenumber=2
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
After reading Logastro's recent posts, I came to a realization. As a result, I sincerely apologize for any stupid newbie comments I have made since I joined the forum.

To Logastro - I know you're trying to sound all postulative and thinking in ways that no one has ever thought before, but give it up man. The debate started out with some substance but now you're just desperately holding onto what you used to believe in order to prove your worth. We all see it, and we don't care about that. Start a new thread and we look at it with a new mind, so don't linger on one failed idea. Think of something new. You have a very creative mind.
 
  • #33
ROFL - this is the funniest theory I've read today, thanks for sharing
 
  • #34
Originally posted by Pergatory
After reading Logastro's recent posts, I came to a realization. As a result, I sincerely apologize for any stupid newbie comments I have made since I joined the forum.
Its all good - a decent attitude, a little bit of an open mind, and a willingness to learn is all you need to do well here. Stupid newbie commens? Pffft - I say something stupid here every day.
 
  • #35
Originally posted by russ_watters
I say something stupid here every day.

according to conservative estimates:wink:
 
  • #36
Well, having listened to this discussion I suppose it could be said that everything has a vibrational aspect.
After all, zero-degree's Kelvin has never been(nor expected to be) experimentally achievable, and has never been observed in nature.
Given that, I suppose that most(if not all) everything has a vibrational component to its existence.
I further assume that when you mention "sound", you are referring to generalized vibration, not specific to the common phenomenon of sound as we are most accustomed to(requiring a physical medium to propagate).
If that's the case well, OK, most would agree and have known that for a long time. Nothing new.
Does gravity have a frequency? Probably so, since everything else seems to. As you may know, experiments have and will be underway to determine this. Or perhaps gravity is a fundamental "flat-line". Who knows? I quess time and experimentation will tell the story.
Your "theory" seems more of an ideology than a scientific theory, as you have clearly failed to establish an environment of testability, and offering nothing new to our current understanding, conjectures or endeavors; as if your are trying to get others to believe in something simply because you say it is so, offering no new real values for others to maturely examine.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
695
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K