Goldstein Chapter 2: Derivation #2 Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter SeReNiTy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Goldstein
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a derivation from Chapter 2 of Goldstein's mechanics textbook, specifically focusing on the conjugate momentum in a system where the Lagrangian includes velocity-dependent terms and the system undergoes rotation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand how to derive the conjugate momentum when the Lagrangian is influenced by velocity terms and how to adjust the expression for rotation about an arbitrary axis. Questions about defining potential with velocity-dependent terms are also raised.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the derivation, with some participants expressing confusion and seeking clarification. Suggestions have been made regarding the relationship between coordinates and rotation, but no consensus or resolution has been reached.

Contextual Notes

Some participants do not have access to the textbook, which may limit their ability to engage fully with the derivation. There is also mention of simplifying assumptions made in other texts regarding coordinate systems.

SeReNiTy
Messages
170
Reaction score
0
Can someone point me in the right direction with the derivation number 2 from Chapter 2 (3rd edition) of Goldstein?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not everybody has the book unfortunately, but if you tell us what derivation it is then perhaps we can help.
 
The derivation is if the lagrangian contained velocity terms, derive what the conjugate momentum will be if the system is rotated by a angle in some direction.
 
I've got Goldstein, and I'm lost on that one too. (As on most of them, btw. :biggrin: )
 
How would you define a potential with velocity dependent terms?
 
SeReNiTy said:
The derivation is if the lagrangian contained velocity terms, derive what the conjugate momentum will be if the system is rotated by a angle in some direction.

Well I hope you know the lagrangian is given by:

[tex]L=T-V = \frac{1}{2} m (\dot{x}+\dot{y}+\dot{z}) - V(x,y,z)[/tex]

In cartesian coordinates. The conjugate momentum for a particular coordinate is given by:

[tex]\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{x}}= p_x[/tex]

Now if the system was rotated by a particular angle how would you then modify the original expression to deal with a rotation. If you consider the x,y,z coordinates to be a vector [tex]\mathbf{r}[/tex] rotated about any arbitrary unit vector [tex]\mathbf{\hat{a}}[/tex] by a small angle [tex]\theta[/tex].

Now all you have to do is findout how the x,y,z coordinates are related to [tex]\mathbf{\hat{a}}[/tex] through vector [tex]\mathbf{r}[/tex] and plug them into the lagrangian and see what the turn up. In some books they set [tex]\mathbf{\hat{a}}[/tex] parallel to the z-axis for ease of computation and normally call it [tex]\mathbf{\hat{k}}[/tex] instead.

Like I say I don't have the textbook but I assume this is something to do with conservation of angular momentum?

Need any more pointers just post.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K