Government detects nonlocality via voting

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a hypothetical voting system where citizens' votes are encoded as 1 for yes and -1 for no, resulting in an average value represented as an angle θ. This angle corresponds to a score of 50/50, equating to π/2 when the average of votes is zero. The covariance of the functions A(n) and B(n) is examined, with a significant covariance suggesting quantum entanglement between two voters. The implications of such entanglement raise questions about the nature of the connection between individuals, likening it to numerology. It is noted that any observed correlation between two individuals' quantum signals could be influenced by shared environmental factors rather than true quantum linkage. The angles θ_n are influenced by the broader social context, and the discussion concludes with the thread being closed for moderation due to its placement in an inappropriate forum.
jk22
Messages
732
Reaction score
25
Suppose a system which looks at votation of each citizen, answers being yes/no coded as 1,-1. Since a lot of people vote it gives an average value that is encoded as an angle ##\theta##, the score 50/50 corresponding then to ##\pi/2## since the average with 1,-1 were 0.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_correlation

Then one has the functions ##A(n),B(n)## and hence if the covariance ##cov(\theta)=\sum_nA(n)B(n)## is bigger than the linear one after a big number of votation, like Bell's theorem seems to indicate, then this would mean that A and B were entangled.

What would it mean in reality that two people were quantumly linked ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds like numerology to me.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
Right, the angle depends on n, so it should be made by a computer, storing the product of vote n in a table divinding theta.
 
jk22 said:
What would it mean in reality that two people were quantumly linked ?

Hypothetically, if there were some quantum "signal" of interest coming from a person that you could measure, and there was a provable unexpected correlation between person A's quantum "signal" and person B's, that correlation could still be due to a shared correlation with an environmental condition.
 
  • Like
Likes jk22
Yes that's exactly that, the angles ##\theta_n## are given by the whole social environnement, and in fact it is not a sum but an average of the A and B results over past choices while the angle is given by the whole population at each votation.
 
Thread is closed for Moderation...
 
After a long Mentor discussion, the thread will remain closed. It appears to be misplaced in the SciFi forum to try to skirt the PF rules for valid sources and reasonable discussions, and does not qualify to be moved to one of the technical forums.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
7K
Replies
125
Views
19K
4
Replies
175
Views
25K
Back
Top