Government detects nonlocality via voting

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of detecting nonlocality through voting, where citizen votes are encoded as 1 (yes) and -1 (no). The average vote is represented as an angle θ, with a 50/50 split corresponding to π/2. The covariance of the voting results, cov(θ) = ∑A(n)B(n), indicates entanglement if it exceeds linear correlations, as suggested by Bell's theorem. The conversation raises questions about the implications of quantum links between individuals and the influence of environmental factors on voting behavior.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bell's theorem in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with covariance and its mathematical implications
  • Knowledge of quantum entanglement concepts
  • Basic principles of statistical averages and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical foundations of Bell's theorem
  • Explore quantum entanglement and its implications in social sciences
  • Study statistical methods for analyzing voting behavior
  • Investigate the role of environmental factors in quantum correlations
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in quantum mechanics, social scientists analyzing voting behavior, and anyone interested in the intersection of quantum theory and collective decision-making.

jk22
Messages
732
Reaction score
25
Suppose a system which looks at votation of each citizen, answers being yes/no coded as 1,-1. Since a lot of people vote it gives an average value that is encoded as an angle ##\theta##, the score 50/50 corresponding then to ##\pi/2## since the average with 1,-1 were 0.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_correlation

Then one has the functions ##A(n),B(n)## and hence if the covariance ##cov(\theta)=\sum_nA(n)B(n)## is bigger than the linear one after a big number of votation, like Bell's theorem seems to indicate, then this would mean that A and B were entangled.

What would it mean in reality that two people were quantumly linked ?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds like numerology to me.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
Right, the angle depends on n, so it should be made by a computer, storing the product of vote n in a table divinding theta.
 
jk22 said:
What would it mean in reality that two people were quantumly linked ?

Hypothetically, if there were some quantum "signal" of interest coming from a person that you could measure, and there was a provable unexpected correlation between person A's quantum "signal" and person B's, that correlation could still be due to a shared correlation with an environmental condition.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jk22
Yes that's exactly that, the angles ##\theta_n## are given by the whole social environnement, and in fact it is not a sum but an average of the A and B results over past choices while the angle is given by the whole population at each votation.
 
Thread is closed for Moderation...
 
After a long Mentor discussion, the thread will remain closed. It appears to be misplaced in the SciFi forum to try to skirt the PF rules for valid sources and reasonable discussions, and does not qualify to be moved to one of the technical forums.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 226 ·
8
Replies
226
Views
24K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
  • · Replies 125 ·
5
Replies
125
Views
20K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 175 ·
6
Replies
175
Views
27K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K