Micromass' big October challenge

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter micromass
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    challenge micromass
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The October challenge hosted by Micromass invites participants to solve advanced mathematical problems with specific rules regarding proof and derivation. Notable challenges include proving the factorial function is primitive recursive and analyzing the motion of a pirate ship in pursuit of a merchant vessel. Participants are encouraged to utilize resources like Google and WolframAlpha, but direct searches for the questions are prohibited. The challenge emphasizes rigorous proof and understanding of mathematical concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of primitive recursive functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with calculus, particularly integration techniques
  • Knowledge of vector calculus and motion analysis
  • Basic concepts of probability and random variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of primitive recursive functions and their applications
  • Learn advanced integration techniques, including numerical methods
  • Explore vector calculus to analyze motion in two dimensions
  • Investigate the distribution of random variables and their transformations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, advanced students in mathematics, and anyone interested in solving complex mathematical challenges and proofs.

  • #121
I think you've got the basic idea=the resultant of ## A +B ## and ## C+D ## which lies along their respective angle bisectors must be equal and opposite. One question I have for you that I'm not sure you answered completely: What if ## A+B ## and ## C+D ## lie in opposite directions, (along with the angle bisectors from these vectors), as is required, does it guarantee that the angle between ## A ## and ## B ## is the same as the angle between ## C ## and ## D ##? Let the angle between ## A ## and ## B ## be ## \theta_1 ##, and the angle between ## C ## and ## D ## be ## \theta_2 ## where ## \theta_1 \neq \theta_2 ##. Can we still have for that case ## A+B =-(C+D) ##? i.e. can we have |A+B|=|C+D|? Why or why not?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #122
Charles Link said:
I think you've got the basic idea=the resultant of ## A +B ## and ## C+D ## which lies along their respective angle bisectors must be equal and opposite. One question I have for you that I'm not sure you answered completely: What if ## A+B ## and ## C+D ## lie in opposite directions, (along with the angle bisectors from these vectors), as is required, does it guarantee that the angle between ## A ## and ## B ## is the same as the angle between ## C ## and ## D ##? Let the angle between ## A ## and ## B ## be ## \theta_1 ##, and the angle between ## C ## and ## D ## be ## \theta_2 ## where ## \theta_1 \neq \theta_2 ##. Can we still have for that case ## A+B =-(C+D) ##? i.e. can we have |A+B|=|C+D|? Why or why not?

Yes, this is necessary. I mentioned that when the magnitudes of two opposite sides are altered together, the angles within each of the two pairs of numbers are increased/decreased by the same amount. Any other translation that would result in different angles is impossible. I edited my main proof to include a more in-depth explanation of this.
 
  • #123
Qualitatively speaking, "increasing the angle..affects the sum..." , your logic is basically correct, but can you express it mathematically?: i.e. Given ## |A|=|B|=1 ## with an angle ## \theta_1 ## between them, please compute the length of the vector sum ## |A+B | ##. The computation involves just a little trigonometry. Have you taken a course in trigonometry yet?
 
  • #124
Charles Link said:
Qualitatively speaking, "increasing the angle..affects the sum..." , your logic is basically correct, but can you express it mathematically?: i.e. Given ## |A|=|B|=1 ## with an angle ## \theta_1 ## between them, please compute the length of the vector sum ## |A+B | ##. The computation involves just a little trigonometry. Have you taken a course in trigonometry yet?

I think that would be ##\sqrt{(\cos\theta+1)^2+sin^2\theta}##, which can be simplified to ##\sqrt{2\cos\theta+2}##.
 
  • #125
EpidermalOblivion said:
I think that would be ##\sqrt{(\cos\theta+1)^2+sin^2\theta}##, which can be simplified to ##\sqrt{2\cos\theta+2}##.
Yes, that is correct. And for the amplitudes ## |A+B| ## and ## |C+D| ## to be equal, what can you say about ## \theta_1 ## and ## \theta_2 ##? ... From what I can see, I think you have successfully solved it...Hopefully @mfb will concur.
 
  • #126
I agree.

They key element is the unique way to get a (non-zero) sum. With that, you can skip all the discussion of the rotations. Every group of 4 numbers will have pairs with opposite non-zero sums, and those opposite sums uniquely identify the elements, with the same angles for both pairs. Done.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
523
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
12K