Micromass' big October challenge

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter micromass
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    challenge micromass
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
125 replies · 21K views
I think you've got the basic idea=the resultant of ## A +B ## and ## C+D ## which lies along their respective angle bisectors must be equal and opposite. One question I have for you that I'm not sure you answered completely: What if ## A+B ## and ## C+D ## lie in opposite directions, (along with the angle bisectors from these vectors), as is required, does it guarantee that the angle between ## A ## and ## B ## is the same as the angle between ## C ## and ## D ##? Let the angle between ## A ## and ## B ## be ## \theta_1 ##, and the angle between ## C ## and ## D ## be ## \theta_2 ## where ## \theta_1 \neq \theta_2 ##. Can we still have for that case ## A+B =-(C+D) ##? i.e. can we have |A+B|=|C+D|? Why or why not?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Charles Link said:
I think you've got the basic idea=the resultant of ## A +B ## and ## C+D ## which lies along their respective angle bisectors must be equal and opposite. One question I have for you that I'm not sure you answered completely: What if ## A+B ## and ## C+D ## lie in opposite directions, (along with the angle bisectors from these vectors), as is required, does it guarantee that the angle between ## A ## and ## B ## is the same as the angle between ## C ## and ## D ##? Let the angle between ## A ## and ## B ## be ## \theta_1 ##, and the angle between ## C ## and ## D ## be ## \theta_2 ## where ## \theta_1 \neq \theta_2 ##. Can we still have for that case ## A+B =-(C+D) ##? i.e. can we have |A+B|=|C+D|? Why or why not?

Yes, this is necessary. I mentioned that when the magnitudes of two opposite sides are altered together, the angles within each of the two pairs of numbers are increased/decreased by the same amount. Any other translation that would result in different angles is impossible. I edited my main proof to include a more in-depth explanation of this.
 
Qualitatively speaking, "increasing the angle..affects the sum..." , your logic is basically correct, but can you express it mathematically?: i.e. Given ## |A|=|B|=1 ## with an angle ## \theta_1 ## between them, please compute the length of the vector sum ## |A+B | ##. The computation involves just a little trigonometry. Have you taken a course in trigonometry yet?
 
Charles Link said:
Qualitatively speaking, "increasing the angle..affects the sum..." , your logic is basically correct, but can you express it mathematically?: i.e. Given ## |A|=|B|=1 ## with an angle ## \theta_1 ## between them, please compute the length of the vector sum ## |A+B | ##. The computation involves just a little trigonometry. Have you taken a course in trigonometry yet?

I think that would be ##\sqrt{(\cos\theta+1)^2+sin^2\theta}##, which can be simplified to ##\sqrt{2\cos\theta+2}##.
 
EpidermalOblivion said:
I think that would be ##\sqrt{(\cos\theta+1)^2+sin^2\theta}##, which can be simplified to ##\sqrt{2\cos\theta+2}##.
Yes, that is correct. And for the amplitudes ## |A+B| ## and ## |C+D| ## to be equal, what can you say about ## \theta_1 ## and ## \theta_2 ##? ... From what I can see, I think you have successfully solved it...Hopefully @mfb will concur.
 
I agree.

They key element is the unique way to get a (non-zero) sum. With that, you can skip all the discussion of the rotations. Every group of 4 numbers will have pairs with opposite non-zero sums, and those opposite sums uniquely identify the elements, with the same angles for both pairs. Done.