GPS and Relativity: Impact of Time Dilation on Earth and Satellites

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter stevebd1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gps Relativity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the impact of time dilation due to gravity and velocity on Earth and satellites, specifically GPS satellites. Key calculations reveal that time dilation on Earth relative to satellites results in a difference of approximately 45.62265 microseconds per day, while the satellites experience a time dilation of about 7.26931 microseconds per day. The total time dilation effect is approximately 38.35334 microseconds per day, necessitating adjustments to atomic clocks on satellites. Additionally, the International Space Station (ISS) experiences a time dilation of between 24.35197 and 25.8877 microseconds per day, requiring its clocks to be sped up to synchronize with those on Earth.

PREREQUISITES
  • General Relativity (GR) concepts, particularly time dilation due to gravity
  • Special Relativity (SR) principles, especially time dilation due to velocity
  • Basic understanding of orbital mechanics and satellite dynamics
  • Familiarity with atomic clock technology and synchronization methods
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of General Relativity on GPS technology and satellite navigation
  • Explore the mathematical derivations of time dilation effects in both GR and SR
  • Investigate the impact of Earth's non-sphericity on satellite timekeeping
  • Learn about the operational adjustments made to atomic clocks on satellites and the ISS
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, aerospace engineers, satellite communication specialists, and anyone interested in the practical applications of relativity in modern technology.

stevebd1
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
747
Reaction score
41
Due to the blogs being removed, I thought it might be worthwhile posting a few in the forums-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQdIjwoi-u4


Time dilation due to gravity (GR)-

d\tau=dt\sqrt{1-\frac{2M}{r}}

where M=Gm/c^2

Time dilation due to velocity (SR)-

d\tau=dt\sqrt{1-\frac{v^2}{c^2}}

Quantities-

Earth's mass- 5.9736e+24 kg

Earth's (mean) radius- 6.371e+6 m

Satellite's altitude- 2e+7 m

Satellite's velocity- 3.889e+3 m/s

86400 seconds in a day


Difference due to gravity-

dT sat (r=6.371e+6 + 2e+7)- 0.999999999833
dT Earth (r=6.371e+6)- 0.999999999304

difference- 0.000000000529

Time dilation on Earth relative to satellite is 4.562265e-05 seconds per day or 45.62265 microseconds


Difference due to velocity-

dT sat (v=3.889e+3)- 0.999999999916
dT Earth- 1 (0.999999999999 at the equator, i.e. ~1)

difference- 0.000000000084

Time dilation on satellite relative to Earth is 7.26931e-06 seconds per day or 7.26931 microseconds


Total time dilation- 38.35334 microseconds per day on Earth, atomic clocks on satellites need to be slowed down to match atomic clocks on Earth.



The ISS-

altitude- 2.78e+5 to 4.6e+5 m

velocity- 7701.11 m/s

The time dilation on the ISS relative to Earth is between 24.35197 and 25.8877 microseconds a day (depending on the altitude) meaning the atomic clocks on the ISS have to be speeded up to match those on Earth in contrast to the GPS satellites (which means that since its inception in 1998, the ISS has traveled forward in time by approx. 0.1 of a second).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A few comments:

(1) You didn't mention it, so I don't know if you are taking into account that an object on the Earth's equator has a nonzero velocity (at least in the frame you appear to be using for your calculations, in which the Earth is assumed to be spherical and non-rotating). Since ##v \approx 450## in SI units, the correction to dT(Earth) is only in the twelfth decimal place, but I think it's still worth mentioning.

(2) For objects that are in free-fall orbits, you can use the formula for orbital velocity in terms of Earth's mass and the orbital radius to get a formula that takes both velocity and altitude into account:

$$
d\tau = \sqrt{1 - \frac{3 G m}{c^2 r}}
$$

(3) It's worth noting that the correction due to the non-sphericity of the Earth is just a smidgen too small to appear in your calculation; it appears in the thirteenth decimal place (this is the correction due to the Earth's quadrupole moment). This illustrates why approximating the Earth as spherical works so well; even in a calculation this precise, non-sphericity can be ignored for many purposes (since the correction is well under 1 percent of the overall value).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
6K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
7K
  • · Replies 101 ·
4
Replies
101
Views
10K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
986
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
7K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
10K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
4K