GR/StatMech/QM foundations, epistemic views only please

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Foundations
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the epistemic versus ontic interpretations of quantum mechanics and their implications for general relativity (GR), statistical mechanics (StatMech), and thermodynamics. Key references include Mermin's video lecture on the confusion between ontic and epistemic views, Jacobson's 1995 paper connecting GR and thermodynamics, and recent works by Freidel and Gielen-Wise proposing alternative models to traditional GR. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these foundational issues to advance research in theoretical physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics interpretations, particularly epistemic and ontic views.
  • Familiarity with general relativity and its mathematical framework.
  • Knowledge of statistical mechanics and thermodynamics principles.
  • Awareness of recent research papers and models in theoretical physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore "Mermin pirsa" for insights on the ontic vs. epistemic debate in quantum mechanics.
  • Read Jacobson's "Thermodynamics of Spacetime: The Einstein Equation of State" for foundational connections between GR and thermodynamics.
  • Investigate Freidel's "relative locality" and Gielen-Wise's observer space models for alternative perspectives on spacetime.
  • Examine recent papers on modular Hamiltonians and their implications for quantum gravity and thermodynamics.
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, researchers in quantum mechanics, and anyone interested in the foundational aspects of GR, StatMech, and thermodynamics. It provides insights into current debates and research directions in the field.

  • #121
atyy said:
I don't think so. In dBB the wave function is ontic, but because dBB is probabilistic it can be subjective (Ballentine's diagram is missing a line from ontic to subjective).
You should email Ballentine and let him know. :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

Graduate Hardy's approach to quantum gravity and QM interpretation
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
8K
Undergrad Problems with Paper on QM Foundations
  • · Replies 90 ·
4
Replies
90
Views
9K
Graduate Loophole-free test of local realism via Hardy's violation
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
7K
Graduate Collapse in QM: in conflict with SR?
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Undergrad Epistemic view of the wave function leads to superluminal signal
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
Undergrad Could Tim Maudlin's Views on Bell and QM Be Flawed?
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
Graduate Does the PBR theorem rule out the 'minimalist' Bohmian interpretation?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Graduate Smolin: Realistic and anti-realistic interpretations of QM
  • · Replies 115 ·
4
Replies
115
Views
14K
Undergrad A Bold New Take on Quantum Theory
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
Undergrad QFT made Bohmian mechanics a non-starter: missed opportunities?
  • · Replies 376 ·
13
Replies
376
Views
23K