GR/StatMech/QM foundations, epistemic views only please

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Foundations
  • #121
atyy said:
I don't think so. In dBB the wave function is ontic, but because dBB is probabilistic it can be subjective (Ballentine's diagram is missing a line from ontic to subjective).
You should email Ballentine and let him know. :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

I Problems with Paper on QM Foundations
  • · Replies 90 ·
4
Replies
90
Views
9K
A Hardy's approach to quantum gravity and QM interpretation
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
8K
A Loophole-free test of local realism via Hardy's violation
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
A Collapse in QM: in conflict with SR?
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
I Epistemic view of the wave function leads to superluminal signal
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
I Could Tim Maudlin's Views on Bell and QM Be Flawed?
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
Does the PBR theorem rule out the 'minimalist' Bohmian interpretation?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
I A Bold New Take on Quantum Theory
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
A Smolin: Realistic and anti-realistic interpretations of QM
  • · Replies 115 ·
4
Replies
115
Views
14K
I QFT made Bohmian mechanics a non-starter: missed opportunities?
  • · Replies 376 ·
13
Replies
376
Views
21K