I Gradient Energy: Definition & Classical Mechanics

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Haorong Wu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Gradient
Haorong Wu
Messages
417
Reaction score
90
TL;DR Summary
Gradient energy is given by ##\frac 1 2 (\nabla \phi)^2##. What does it represent?
In page 40 of Spacetime and geometry by Sean M. Carroll, when consider the classical mechanics of a single real scalar field, it reads that the field will have an energy density including various contributions:
kinetic energy:##\frac 1 2 \dot \phi^2##
gradient energy:##\frac 1 2 (\nabla \phi)^2##
potential energy:##V(\phi)##

I am not familiar with gradient energy. I googled it, but it returns with energy gradient, which I do not think is the same thing.

Also, is this gradient energy introduced because it and kinetic energy can combine into a covariant form?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's the energy cost due to spatial variation of the field phi. It's just nomenclature.
 
haushofer said:
It's the energy cost due to spatial variation of the field phi. It's just nomenclature.
Thanks. Is there any simple example that could help me memorize it?

I am thiking about electric field. Could I say the field vary from point to point, so the energy associated with one point is different from another one. The difference between two very close points will be something like gradient energy?
 
Haorong Wu said:
Thanks. Is there any simple example that could help me memorize it?

I am thiking about electric field. Could I say the field vary from point to point, so the energy associated with one point is different from another one. The difference between two very close points will be something like gradient energy?
Yes, as long as you don't confuse the electric field for a scalar field ;)
 
Hi, @haushofer . I am a little confused now. Could a scalar field not represent an electric field? I thought this was valid because in some papers, I read that the scalar field is used to study the transpotation of light. For example, in https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.04217 , the paragraph before Eq. (2).
 
Maybe in some effective treatment I'm not familiar with, but a general time dependent electric field cannot be written with just a scalar field.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
Back
Top