Differences between Actions in Curved Spacetime

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Haorong Wu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spacetime
Haorong Wu
Messages
422
Reaction score
90
TL;DR
I have found two different actions of scalar field in curved spacetime. I am not sure their differences.
First, in Anastopoulos C, Hu B L. A master equation for gravitational decoherence: probing the textures of spacetime[J]. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 2013, 30(16): 165007. , the Einstein-Hilbert action is used to analysis a quantum matter field interacting with the gravitational field, $$S=\frac 1 \kappa \int d^4 x \sqrt{-g} R + \int d^4 x \sqrt {-g} (-\frac 1 2 g^{\mu \nu} \nabla_{\mu} \phi \nabla_{\nu} \phi-\frac 1 2 m^2 \phi^2) .$$

Then, in Spacetime and geometry by Sean M. Carroll, section 9.4, the quantum field theory in curved spacetime consider the following Lagrange density $$L=\sqrt {-g} (-\frac 1 2 g^{\mu \nu} \nabla_{\mu} \phi \nabla_{\nu} \phi-\frac 1 2 m^2 \phi^2 -\xi R \phi^2) .$$

It appears that in the first paper, the curvature scalar ##R## does not couple to the scalar field, while the one in the second case does.

Are the two actions/Lagrangians describe different situations?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71
on Phys.org
Haorong Wu said:
Summary:: I have found two different actions of scalar field in curved spacetime. I am not sure their differences.
[tex]S=\frac 1 \kappa \int d^4 x \sqrt{-g} R + \int d^4 x \sqrt {-g} (-\frac 1 2 g^{\mu \nu} \nabla_{\mu} \phi \nabla_{\nu} \phi-\frac 1 2 m^2 \phi^2) .[/tex][tex]L=\sqrt {-g} (-\frac 1 2 g^{\mu \nu} \nabla_{\mu} \phi \nabla_{\nu} \phi-\frac 1 2 m^2 \phi^2 -\xi R \phi^2).[/tex]
In 4 dimensions and for [itex]m = 0[/itex], the first action is not conformal invariant while the second one is invariant for the specific value [itex]\xi = \frac{1}{6}[/itex]. Also, the case [itex]\xi = 0[/itex] is called minimally coupled.
Are the two actions/Lagrangians describe different situations?
Yes they are, for you can convince yourself by deriving the equations of motions and the energy-momentum tensors from both actions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K