Graduate School resume/guidance please

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a senior physics undergraduate seeking guidance on improving their academic profile for graduate school applications. Participants explore strategies related to GPA improvement, research involvement, and the relevance of extracurricular activities.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses concern about their current GPA of 2.2 and the lack of science-related extracurriculars, emphasizing the need for significant improvement to be competitive for graduate school.
  • Another participant stresses the importance of achieving a high GPA, suggesting that a target of 4.0 is necessary to offset past performance and that a GPA north of 3.0 may not be sufficient.
  • Several participants highlight the critical role of research experience, advising that simply getting involved is not enough; excelling in research is essential.
  • There is a discussion about the perceived value of extracurricular activities, with one participant noting that while they can be beneficial, they should not overshadow the importance of grades and research.
  • A participant acknowledges the difficulty of certain upcoming courses, particularly statistical mechanics, and expresses concern about their potential impact on GPA.
  • Another participant warns that a single low grade could jeopardize future graduate school prospects, emphasizing the need for a robust plan to achieve higher grades.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that a GPA of at least 3.0 is necessary for graduate school applications, but there is disagreement on the feasibility of achieving this given the current academic standing and course difficulty. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best strategies to improve the applicant's profile.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of a strong academic performance in the remaining semesters and the challenges posed by difficult courses. There is an acknowledgment of the need for a strategic approach to both grades and research involvement.

cmyers152
Messages
19
Reaction score
4
HI everyone,

I am currently a senior at a big university who will be finishing up my BS in physics in either Fall of 2018 or Spring of 2019. I would like to go to graduate school after undergrad, but as of this moment there is no way I would get accepted to any school at all. To give you some background, I currently have a 2.2 GPA and no science related extra-circulars. Up to this point I have had some emotional issues that have turned into me switching majors 3 times and having some poor grades stem from that. Now, the good news is I'm not someone with no extra-circulars or the drive to do better. For example, I just took an accelerated calc 4 class and received a 3.5 (my school does our grades in increments of .5), and I also am a part of a greek organization that raised $10k worth of filtration straws for the children of Flint Michigan, I played a leadership role in that project. Now to continue from that, I plan on spending my next year to two years doing as well as I possibly can in classes, I realistically believe I can hold a GPA north of a 3.0 over that time period as I have quit my part time job and taken a step back from my greek organization. To add to that I have also spent the past two weeks applying to research jobs at my university in hopes of getting involved in that this fall, I unfortunately have not heard anything positive besides "try back once school starts".

Besides the above, I plan to take the general GRE this August and then the Physics GRE next summer. I believe that if I do relatively well on those two tests I can give myself half a chance of getting accepted. Plus, I believe that I am relatively well-rounded as I have been able to prove on several occasions that I can be social, but also can give back through community service (over 800+ recorded hours), some of that time was spent tutoring children in low income areas in math and science.

This upcoming year I plan to take Quantum 1, electricity and magnetism 1, thermal physics, an electronics lab, and intro to nuclear physics (capstone requirement). In fall of 2018 I plan on taking stat. mag, linear algebra, then a masters level classical mechanics course. I can graduate after that semester, but I am thinking about spreading it out into that spring semester and adding quantum 2 and another graduate level course.

I know the chances of me getting into even a low end masters program out of undergrad is very unlikely, with everything I have said above is there anyone who can help me out in additional skills or resume builders that will help me land a spot at a graduate school? At this point I have plenty of soft skills, but not a lot of hard skills.

Feel free to be a little brash, I can handle it. I would rather receive help in a critical way than no help wrapped up in a nice bow, if you get what I mean.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's truly remarkable how sensitive are to some folks to helpful criticism on this site. I had to take a break from responding for this reason alone. You're in a tough spot, but the biggest thing you have going for yourself is contained in your last statement
cmyers152 said:
Feel free to be a little brash, I can handle it. I would rather receive help in a critical way than no help wrapped up in a nice bow, if you get what I mean.
The path to success would be quicker for many if they adopted your attitude.

A lot will depend on how you do this Fall (and perhaps Spring). This is your chance to prove your critics (mainly your inner voice) wrong. You absolutely have to do very well in the remainder of your classes, not only for self confidence, but to prove that physics is the right choice for you and to bump up your GPA. A lot of programs will look favorably on a sudden reversal of fortunes - everyone roots for the underdog - but you have to be careful not to overload yourself with too much work and thus shoot yourself in the foot.

The second task before you is to try to find a research spot well before you submit your applications. Due to your schedule this Fall this may have to wait until the year following the one in which you graduate. There is no harm and, in your case, perhaps only benefit, from devoting a 5th year to research.

Others will have more to say but, in closing, I propose you post again with an update after you get your Fall grades.
 
Let me amplify what DrSteve said.

1. Grades - this is the most important thing to work on, because it's what will be holding you back. Your target needs to be a 4.0. "North of a 3.0" won't cut it, and to be honest, if that's the best you can do in undergrad, you won't make it in grad school, where the courses are harder and the GPA requirements are stricter.

2. Research - this is important, almost as important as grades. Again, given where you are, "getting involved" won't cut it. You need to excel. My advice is to a) listen, b) ask questions and c) don't complain that any task they give you is beneath you.

3. Extracurriculars - nobody in grad admissions cares about them. That isn't to say you should avoid them, but you should do them because you want to, not because you think it looks good on your application.
 
Thank you both for taking the time to respond. As of about an hour ago I've sent off three more emails looking into more research positions throughout the physics department. If those don't work I'll start looking into the engineering department.

As for what you've said vanadium by north of a 3.0 I absolutely agree with you. 90% of my classes I see as a chance at a high 3.5/4.0, but I look at the master level courses I'll be attempting to take and stat mag and see those as 3.0 candidates. The stat mag here is known for being one of our toughest courses with exam averages in the high 20%'s. But absolutely, 4.0 is the goal and I'll do nothing short of everything I can to attain that.
 
Also, vanadium, thank you for pointing that out on the extra circulars, I honestly felt like those would've helped for a resume, but maybe I should leave those as something for an interview as I want to make myself sound as well rounded as possible. I have an advisor who's on our graduate admissions board (I can't apply to my own school for grad school) and he says it's a good talking point but obviously grades and research are paramount here.
 
cmyers152 said:
I look at the master level courses I'll be attempting to take and stat mag and see those as 3.0 candidates

Then you have a problem. Most graduate schools require a 3.0 to graduate or even continue. If you can't get above a 3.0, a single C will end your graduate school career. And the admissions committee will know this.

Basically, a plan that has you doing a little better isn't going to cut it. You need a plan to do a lot better.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dr. Courtney
We advise all the undergrads we mentor that a cumulative 3.0 is the absolute minimum if they hope to go to grad school.

Do the math. You need to earn a lot of As to pull a 2.2 up to a 3.0. No more Cs or C+s. Period.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: cmyers152

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K