Graph theory, rank and other characteristics

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding graph theory concepts, specifically incidence matrices, ranks, layers, and the term "peak." The user successfully found the incidence matrix but struggles with the definitions of rank and layers, noting the ambiguity of the term "peak." Responses clarify that "peak" likely refers to nodes with specific characteristics, either having no outgoing or no incoming arrows, but emphasize the lack of standardization in terminology. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in defining node ranks and how to arrange nodes accordingly, as existing definitions primarily address the rank of the entire graph rather than individual nodes. Overall, the user seeks guidance on how to proceed with their graph-related homework.
prehisto
Messages
111
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


hello, I have this graph and i have to figure out these so to speak characteristics.
1) find incidence matrix
2) arrange peak according to rank and layers
3)draw new arranged graph
4) find new connection matricies of peaks and arcs
14v6vqv.jpg

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I managed to find the incidence matrix which was pretty much easy but I can't manage to understand what is rank of peaks and what is layers in this context ,there are a lot of different notations out there in various sources.
please help?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ranks and layers seem to be standard terminology. It is 'peak' that is uncommon.

The introduction to this web article gives a good explanation of what a layering of a directed acyclic graph (DAG) is, what a layer is and what a rank is.

Only 'peak' is not mentioned. A natural guess would be that a peak is either
  • a node from which there are no outgoing arrows, or
  • a node to which there are no incoming arrows.
Either of these could be chosen, but not both. What does your textbook say? I would go for the first one, since I tend to think of arrows as pointing UP.
 
andrewkirk said:
Ranks and layers seem to be standard terminology. It is 'peak' that is uncommon.

The introduction to this web article gives a good explanation of what a layering of a directed acyclic graph (DAG) is, what a layer is and what a rank is.

Only 'peak' is not mentioned. A natural guess would be that a peak is either
  • a node from which there are no outgoing arrows, or
  • a node to which there are no incoming arrows.
Either of these could be chosen, but not both. What does your textbook say? I would go for the first one, since I tend to think of arrows as pointing UP.

Hi, thanks for your reply.
Now i understand that node=vertex but why do you think that there should be separation between a node from which there are no outgoing arrows and a node to which there are no incoming arrows? My graph consists of nodes where edges are incoming as well as outgoing.

I do not have any textbook.

Now, If i want need to arrange nodes according to rank and layers, i really do not know what to do. Because only definitions i can find about rank in graph theory context is about rank of whole graph not node rank.
 
prehisto said:
why do you think that there should be separation between a node from which there are no outgoing arrows and a node to which there are no incoming arrows
I don't understand this question. I did not say anything about separation.
prehisto said:
I do not have any textbook.
Where did you get this problem?
prehisto said:
. Because only definitions i can find about rank in graph theory context is about rank of whole graph not node rank.
The link I gave defines rank in a way that applies to individual nodes, not the whole graph. It defines how to partition the graph into subsets, and all nodes in the same subset are given the same rank.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K