MHB Graphics Coordinate: Is This Correct?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion confirms that the answer to the graphics coordinate question is E. The inequality (x − 1)⁴ < (x − 1) is satisfied between the x-values of 1 and 2, as demonstrated by evaluating the function at x = 1.5. The intersection of the graphs is found by equating the two functions and factoring the resulting equation. It is noted that the curve y = (x - 1)⁴ lies below the line y = x - 1 exclusively in the interval (1, 2). This analysis affirms the correctness of the initial conclusion regarding the inequality.
squexy
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
View attachment 2983

The answer is E.

Since the line is passing the parable at x = 1 and 2 I used between these values to satisfy the inequality(x − 1)4< (x − 1)X = 1,5

(1,5 -1)4 < (1,5 -1)
0,0625 < 0,5

Is this correct?
 

Attachments

  • asdhiausdh.jpg
    asdhiausdh.jpg
    16.8 KB · Views: 97
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would begin by finding the $x$-values for which the two graphs intersect. We can do this by equating the two functions:

$$(x-1)^4=x-1$$

$$(x-1)^4-(x-1)=0$$

Now, what do you get when you factor?
 
I was going to type exactly what MarkFL did, but he beat me at it :p

I also want to note that the question has graciously graphed the curves for us, and by inspection, we see that $y=(x-1)^4$ is under the line $y=x-1$ on the interval $(1, 2)$ only, which is the only interval that satisfies your inequality.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
513
Replies
1
Views
624
Back
Top