Gravitation and Binomial Expansion

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on using the binomial expansion to derive the approximate change in gravitational acceleration (g) at a height Δr above the Earth's surface. The formula Δg ≈ -2g(Δr/rE) is established, where rE represents the Earth's radius. The participant initially struggled with the application of the binomial expansion but successfully navigated through the problem by substituting x = Δr/rE into the gravitational equation g = GM/r². This approach confirms the relationship between height and gravitational acceleration as long as Δr is significantly smaller than rE.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of binomial expansion and its applications
  • Familiarity with gravitational equations, specifically g = GM/r²
  • Basic knowledge of calculus, particularly Taylor series
  • Concept of limits, particularly Δr << rE
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the binomial expansion in detail
  • Explore gravitational equations and their implications in physics
  • Learn about Taylor series and their applications in approximations
  • Investigate the effects of altitude on gravitational acceleration
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding gravitational forces and mathematical approximations in physics.

novicephysicist
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use the binomial expansion (1± x)n = 1± nx + (n(n-1)/2) x2 ±...
to show that the value of g is altered by approximately Δg ≈ -2g(Δr/rE) at a height Δr above the Earth's surface, where rE is the radius of the Earth, as long as Δr<<rE

Homework Equations



g=GM/r2

The Attempt at a Solution


I had completely forgotten binomial expansions, so I looked it up and found an equation that seemed to apply:
x=Δr/rE
and then
(Δr±rE) = rEn(1±Δr/rE)n
I plugged this into the equation for gravitational acceleration and got
g=GM/[rEn(1±Δr/rE)n]2
I'm not sure if I should substitute 2 for the n? Honestly I'm not sure where to go from here at all. Hopefully I did something correctly? (Note: this is my first time on Physics Forums, so I hope I formatted this correctly and everything)

Any help would be appreciated, thank you :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Never mind, I figured it out!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K