Gravitational Binding Energy vs total mass energy

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Gravitational Binding Energy (GBE) of Earth is quantified as 2 * 10^32 J, which is the energy required to disperse all matter of the planet to infinity. In contrast, the total mass energy of Earth is 5.4 * 10^41 J, representing the energy obtainable if all mass were converted to electromagnetic energy. To completely annihilate the planet, including its gravitational effects, would necessitate the total mass energy, while the GBE is sufficient to prevent re-gravitation of the planet's remnants. The distinction between these energy values is crucial for understanding planetary destruction scenarios.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gravitational Binding Energy (GBE)
  • Familiarity with mass-energy equivalence (E=mc²)
  • Basic knowledge of electromagnetic energy conversion
  • Concept of gravitational effects in astrophysics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of Gravitational Binding Energy in astrophysics
  • Explore the concept of mass-energy equivalence in particle physics
  • Study the processes of matter-antimatter annihilation
  • Investigate the effects of energy deposition on planetary bodies
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and students of astrophysics interested in planetary dynamics and energy interactions in celestial bodies.

tacsec
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
The Gravitational Binding Energy of Earth is 2 * 10^32 J.
But the total mass energy of Earth is 5.4 *10^41 J.
So the shatter the planet into pieces it would require 2*10^32 J of energy, and to completely destroy the planet without leaving a trace of its existence would require 5.4 *10^41 J right?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Hi tacsec, welcome to PF

No, that's not what these numbers mean. Gravitational binding energy of Earth is the energy needed to remove every single bit of matter that makes up our planet to infinity.

The energy content of mass is what you'd get if you managed to convert all the mass into electromagnetic energy - e.g., if half of it turned into antimatter and annihilated with the other half.

Note that in the second case, the energy is still gravitating, so the total will get reduced by the amount equal to the binding energy as the light produced by annihilation travels away to infinity.

Whether either of those cases counts as "completely destroying" is up to your personal interpretation.
 
Bandersnatch said:
Hi tacsec, welcome to PF

No, that's not what these numbers mean. Gravitational binding energy of Earth is the energy needed to remove every single bit of matter that makes up our planet to infinity.

The energy content of mass is what you'd get if you managed to convert all the mass into electromagnetic energy - e.g., if half of it turned into antimatter and annihilated with the other half.

Note that in the second case, the energy is still gravitating, so the total will get reduced by the amount equal to the binding energy as the light produced by annihilation travels away to infinity.

Whether either of those cases counts as "completely destroying" is up to your personal interpretation.

Okay. So let's say you vaporize Earth completely. Is the minimum amount of energy required the GBE? Or let's say you shatter the planet. Is that the GBE?
 
The GBE is just the "gravity holding all the atoms together" energy. The atomic energy as in annihilation of every atom in Earth would be mc2.
 
tacsec said:
Okay. So let's say you vaporize Earth completely. Is the minimum amount of energy required the GBE? Or let's say you shatter the planet. Is that the GBE?
If you deposited the gravitational binding energy of the Earth to the Earth, you would, in principle, destroy the Earth so badly that it would never even re-gravitate and re-create itself since every piece of the Earth will fly "to infinity".
 
And to answer the question directly - I'd say that falls under "vaporize", as long as we're not too concerned with precision.
 
Bandersnatch said:
And to answer the question directly - I'd say that falls under "vaporize", as long as we're not too concerned with precision.
What falls under vaporize? GBE?
 
Yeah.
 
Bandersnatch said:
Yeah.
Gotcha.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K