Gravitational Fields: Same or Different?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Shaw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fields Gravitational
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Birkhoff's theorem, which states that the exterior gravitational fields of spherically symmetric objects are indistinguishable in the absence of a sense of scale. However, when considering the time it takes for test objects to fall through these fields, the discussion reveals that a test object in a weak gravitational field falls more slowly than one in a strong field, but the latter has a greater distance to fall. Ultimately, the conclusion is that with careful selection of starting distances, test objects can be made to arrive at the Schwarzschild radius simultaneously, despite differences in gravitational strength.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Birkhoff's theorem
  • Familiarity with Schwarzschild radius
  • Basic principles of General Relativity (GR)
  • Knowledge of Newtonian mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of Birkhoff's theorem in astrophysics
  • Study the calculations involving Schwarzschild radius and gravitational fields
  • Investigate the differences between weak and strong gravitational fields
  • Learn about the dynamics of test objects in General Relativity
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of astrophysics, and anyone interested in the principles of gravitational fields and General Relativity.

Shaw
Messages
46
Reaction score
3
In the absence of a sense of scale, will the gravitational fields of large objects be indistinguishable, one from the other?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, in the case of the exterior field of a spherically symmetric object. This is Birkhoff's theorem.
 
Can we therefore conclude that the amount of time needed for a test object (suitable to the size of the object) to fall through a gravitational field will be the same? This may require reducing the object to its Schwarzschild radius.
 
Shaw said:
In the absence of a sense of scale, will the gravitational fields of large objects be indistinguishable, one from the other?
Shaw said:
Can we therefore conclude that the amount of time needed for a test object (suitable to the size of the object) to fall through a gravitational field will be the same?
In the absence of a sense of time, it would take the same time.
But I'm not sure I follow your logic.
 
SlowThinker said:
In the absence of a sense of time, it would take the same time.
But I'm not sure I follow your logic.
A test object in a weak gravitational field will fall through the field to the Schwarzschild radius more slowly than a test object in a strong field, but an object in a strong field has further to fall. Intuitively, I think that it's a wash, and all appropriate test objects in all fields will take the same amount of time to reach the Schwarzschild radius. They all arrive at the radius at the same time.
 
Shaw said:
A test object in a weak gravitational field will fall through the field to the Schwarzschild radius more slowly than a test object in a strong field, but an object in a strong field has further to fall. Intuitively, I think that it's a wash, and all appropriate test objects in all fields will take the same amount of time to reach the Schwarzschild radius. They all arrive at the radius at the same time.
A gravitational field has no end. If you fall from a given distance, then a heavier object will attract you faster, and you'll have (a bit) shorter distance to fall.
If you carefully select the starting distance, the falling time will be the same. In Newtonian mechanics, you'd have to move 2x farther for an 8x heavier planet. In GR, it should be pretty close to the Newtonian result but I haven't done that calculation.
 
Thanks for this. I take it that this means that while Birkhoff's Theorum states that all gravitational fields look the same, when a sense of scale is missing we can tell one field from another by dropping test masses from, say, a point where the gravitational force is 1% of its value at the Schwarzschild radius, and the test masses will arrive at the radius at different times.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
804
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 103 ·
4
Replies
103
Views
7K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K