Gravitational potential energy between Earth and Moon

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
8 replies · 11K views
fogvajarash
Messages
127
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider the Earth's radius to be 6.40x103km, its mass to be 6.00x1024kg, the Moon's mass to be 7.36x1022kg, and the Moon's radius to be 1.74x103km. The average value for the Earth-Moon distance is 3.84x105kg. Neglect friction and rotation.

a. Sketch the potential energy as a function of the position on a line between the Earth's centre and the Moon's centre, for positions between the surfaces of the two bodies (ignore positions inside the bodies).
b. Find the position where the potential has an extremum (maximum or minimum) between the Earth and the Moon. Find the gravitational force on a test particle of mass m at that location.
c. Calculate the minimum work required to transport a mass of 1.0kg from the surface of the Earth to the surface of the moon, ignoring air resistance.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure on how to start with this problem. I don't know how i should graph the potential energy as a function of the position on a line (firstly, how can we find the potential energy in a point between two masses? Calculate both potential energies with respect to the Moon and Earth at that point?). As well, how can we calculate the work required to transport the mass? I tried finding the difference in potential energy between a point in the surface to a point in the Moon, but it doesn't work (answer is 58.7 MJ).

Thank you in advance.
 
on Phys.org
if you have a line, D, between two points, and you are traveling between them, choose r to be the distance between you and the left point. Then the distance between you and the right point is D-r.

The potential energy due to two masses is just the superposition of the potential from each individual mass.
 
haruspex said:
I feel c) is ambiguous. Is it asking for net work, or the amount of work that has to be available to achieve the transfer?

I think they just want students, once they get force as a function of x, to integrate it along a straight line.
 
Pythagorean said:
I think they just want students, once they get force as a function of x, to integrate it along a straight line.
The thing is that supposedly we aren't required to use calculus for all of the exercises. I feel that b. as well requires some calc in order to optimize the function (and wouldn't it be negative everywhere, and have the extrema at the end points?

Edit: Wouldn't the function that gives the potential energy be:

[itex]E_{p}=\displaystyle\frac{-Gm_{e}m_{p}}{t}-\displaystyle\frac{Gm_{m}m_{p}}{3.48x10^{8}-t}[/itex]

Where mp is a point mass?
 
Last edited:
Yes, though t bothers me since it's often used for time. I would go with r, but that's just convention and not technically wrong.

I have no idea how you'd do it without calculus.
 
Pythagorean said:
I think they just want students, once they get force as a function of x, to integrate it along a straight line.
No integration needed. Part a) found the potentials.
Part b) suggests differentiation, but there might be another way.
 
I have tried differentiating but to no avail. The answers are here if anyone can find out what it is about:

Extrema positions: ([itex]9.28x10^{6}m, 7.51x10^{8}m[/itex])