Gravitational Time Dilation Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves gravitational time dilation, specifically comparing the lifespan of a person living at a higher altitude (3.1 km above sea level) to that at sea level. The original poster is attempting to determine how much longer the individual could have lived at sea level based on the provided equations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster presents equations related to gravitational time dilation and attempts to equate the time experienced at sea level and at altitude. They express confusion regarding their calculation suggesting that time at sea level should be longer.

Discussion Status

Participants are engaging in a dialogue to clarify the original poster's assumptions about the relationship between time experienced at different altitudes. There is a recognition of the calculations made, and some participants are guiding the original poster to reconsider their understanding of the results.

Contextual Notes

The original poster's interpretation of the problem statement raises questions about the assumptions made regarding time dilation effects at different altitudes. The discussion reflects a need to explore these assumptions further without reaching a definitive conclusion.

J_M_R
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A person lived 75 years in a city located 3.1km above sea level. How much longer could they have lived at sea level? (Times are measured by an observer at infinite distance).

Homework Equations



tr/t∞ = {1 - [ (2GM) / (r(c^2)) ]}^(1/2)

Rc (Radius at city) = Rearth + 3.1km

∴ t(sea-level)/t∞ = {1 - [ (2GMe) / (Rearth(c^2)) ]}^(1/2)

and ∴ t(city)/t∞ = {1 - [ (2GMe) / (Rc(c^2)) ]}^(1/2)

The Attempt at a Solution



t(sea-level) / {1 - [ (2GMe) / (Rearth(c^2)) ]}^(1/2) ≈ t(city) / {1 - [ (2GMe) / (Rc(c^2)) ]}^(1/2)

Having made the the two t∞ equal to each other.

Knowing t(city) = 75 years this gave t(sea-level) as 74.99 years.

Where have I gone wrong as shouldn't t(sea-level) be longer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
J_M_R said:
Where have I gone wrong as shouldn't t(sea-level) be longer?

What gives you that idea?
 
PeroK said:
What gives you that idea?

I was just using the fact that the question says "How much longer could they have lived at sea level?" so assumed t(sea-level) should therefore be longer?
 
J_M_R said:
I was just using the fact that the question says "How much longer could they have lived at sea level?" so assumed t(sea-level) should therefore be longer?
Ask yourself, which of the two has longer until his 76th birthday according to your calculations.
 
Bandersnatch said:
Ask yourself, which of the two has longer until his 76th birthday according to your calculations.
Ah, so the t(sea-level) has longer until his 76th birthday so the person could have lived 0.01 years longer at sea level according to my calculations?
 
You got it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: J_M_R
Bandersnatch said:
You got it.
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K