Calculating Muon's Time Dilation and Travel Distance in a Particle Accelerator

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of time dilation and travel distance for a muon in a particle accelerator, specifically focusing on its observed lifetime and the distance it travels around a circular storage ring. The subject area includes concepts from relativistic physics, particularly time dilation and invariant intervals.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the muon's rest frame lifetime and the dilated lifetime observed by an experimenter. There are attempts to apply the invariant interval formula to calculate the distance traveled. Some participants question the correctness of initial calculations and suggest reconsidering the effects of relativistic speeds.

Discussion Status

The discussion has seen corrections and clarifications regarding the calculations, particularly the inclusion of the speed of light in the distance formula. Participants are engaging in a back-and-forth to refine their understanding of the problem and the implications of relativistic effects on the muon's behavior.

Contextual Notes

There is a recognition of the challenges in identifying subtle issues in relativistic problems, such as the speed of the muon being approximately the speed of light. Participants express a desire to improve their problem-solving skills and critical analysis of answers.

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31

Homework Statement



The muon has been measured to have a mass of ##0.106\ \text{GeV}## and a rest frame lifetime of ##2.19 \times 10^{-6}## seconds. Imagine that such a muon is moving in the circular storage ring of a particle accelerator, ##1## kilometer in diameter, such that the muon's total energy is ##1000\ \text{GeV}##. How long would it appear to live from the experimenter's point of view? How many radians would it travel around the ring?

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



Proper time runs in the muon's rest frame. Therefore, the experimenter observes a dilated lifetime of the muon.

Therefore, from the experimenter's point of view,

lifetime ##= \gamma \tau = \frac{E}{mc^{2}} \tau = \big(\frac{1000}{.106}\big)(2.19 \times 10^{-6}) = 20.7 \times 10^{-3}## seconds.Using the invariant interval in the muon's rest frame, and the experimenter frame,

##- (\delta \tau)^{2} = - (\delta t)^{2} + (\delta x)^{2}##

##\delta x = \sqrt{(\delta t)^{2}- (\delta \tau)^{2}}##

##\delta x = 0.0207## m.

Therefore, number of radians ##= \frac{0.0207}{500} = 4.14 \times 10^{-5}##.

Are my answers correct?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer for ##t## looks correct. The answer for ##x## cannot possibly be correct (you should be able to see it's far too small). What have you forgotten?
 
Last edited:
Hmm... missed out on a factor of ##c##.

Here's the corrected version:

##- (c \delta \tau)^{2} = - (c \delta t)^{2} + (\delta x)^{2}##

##\delta x = c \sqrt{(\delta t)^{2}- (\delta \tau)^{2}}##

##\delta x = 6.21 \times 10^{6}## m.

Therefore, number of radians ##= \frac{6.21 \times 10^{6}}{500} = 12420##.Is it correct now?
 
failexam said:

Homework Statement



The muon has been measured to have a mass of ##0.106\ \text{GeV}## and a rest frame lifetime of ##2.19 \times 10^{-6}## seconds. Imagine that such a muon is moving in the circular storage ring of a particle accelerator, ##1## kilometer in diameter, such that the muon's total energy is ##1000\ \text{GeV}##. How long would it appear to live from the experimenter's point of view? How many radians would it travel around the ring?

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



Proper time runs in the muon's rest frame. Therefore, the experimenter observes a dilated lifetime of the muon.

Therefore, from the experimenter's point of view,

lifetime ##= \gamma \tau = \frac{E}{mc^{2}} \tau = \big(\frac{1000}{.106}\big)(2.19 \times 10^{-6}) = 20.7 \times 10^{-3}## seconds.Using the invariant interval in the muon's rest frame, and the experimenter frame,

##- (\delta \tau)^{2} = - (\delta t)^{2} + (\delta x)^{2}##

##\delta x = \sqrt{(\delta t)^{2}- (\delta \tau)^{2}}##

##\delta x = 0.0207## m.

Therefore, number of radians ##= \frac{0.0207}{500} = 4.14 \times 10^{-5}##.

Are my answers correct?
You know the muon is essentially traveling at the speed of light, so how far does it travel before decaying?
 
failexam said:
Hmm... missed out on a factor of ##c##.

Here's the corrected version:

##- (c \delta \tau)^{2} = - (c \delta t)^{2} + (\delta x)^{2}##

##\delta x = c \sqrt{(\delta t)^{2}- (\delta \tau)^{2}}##

##\delta x = 6.21 \times 10^{6}## m.

Therefore, number of radians ##= \frac{6.21 \times 10^{6}}{500} = 12420##.Is it correct now?

As pointed out above, when a particle has such a high gamma factor, it's speed is approximately ##c##, so ##x \approx ct##. You can see from your equation that ##\sqrt{(\delta t)^{2}- (\delta \tau)^{2}} \approx \delta t##. Which amounts to the same thing.
 
Ah! Right! My answer's correct, but the formula for the invariant interval is redundant because the muon essentially travels at the speed of light.
 
Is that it?
 
failexam said:
Is that it?

Yes.
 
I see that, in all the problems I solve, I can work out most of the steps by itself. But at some places, I get stuck and need help.

Also, I don't always see the subtle issues like the fact that the muon speed is the speed of light in the problem above and solve problems in a longwinded way.

How do I get myself rid of these difficulties?
 
  • #10
failexam said:
I see that, in all the problems I solve, I can work out most of the steps by itself. But at some places, I get stuck and need help.

Also, I don't always see the subtle issues like the fact that the muon speed is the speed of light in the problem above and solve problems in a longwinded way.

How do I get myself rid of these difficulties?

I wouldn't worry about not spotting shortcuts, but try to remember this one. It's quite common in these problems. However, you shouldn't have been happy with your answer of 2cm. Get into the habit of critically analysing your answers: whether they are algebraic or numeric. You can't always sanity check an answer, but often you can get a feel for when things are not right.
 
  • #11
Is there a correlation between being able to solve problems from problem sets and being a high quality researcher whose papers get published in reputed journals?

I mean, do these skills ultimately help when you become a research physicist and have to solve open-ended problems?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K