Gravitational Warping by Non-Spherical Celestial Bodies

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Gerinski
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    bodies Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the gravitational warping effects produced by non-spherical celestial bodies, such as cubes, pyramids, rods, or horseshoes. It concludes that the orbits of objects in proximity to these massive shapes would not be elliptical, primarily exhibiting Newtonian effects rather than relativistic ones. The conversation highlights that the gravitational field is influenced by the stress-energy tensor, which incorporates factors like pressure and shear stresses, as evidenced by the perihelion precession of Mercury due to the Sun's oblateness.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newtonian gravity
  • Familiarity with the concept of geodesics
  • Knowledge of the stress-energy tensor in general relativity
  • Basic principles of orbital mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the effects of non-spherical mass distributions on gravitational fields
  • Study the mathematical formulation of geodesics in general relativity
  • Explore the implications of the stress-energy tensor on gravitational phenomena
  • Investigate perihelion precession and its causes in celestial mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and students of general relativity who are interested in the effects of non-standard celestial shapes on gravitational dynamics and orbital mechanics.

Gerinski
Messages
322
Reaction score
15
Purely theoretically, if there were very massive celestial bodies which were not spherical, how would their gravitational warping be? Which shapes would the geodesical paths around them have? Would they still be elliptical orbits or would they have sudden changes of direction?
Say for example, a huge massive cube, or huge a pyramid, a rod or a giant horseshoe? If a freefalling object would approach those and fall into orbit, which kind of path would it follow?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the examples you're describing, the main effect would be Newtonian, not relativistic. The orbits would of course not be elliptical. A less extreme example is that part of the perihelion precession of Mercury is due to the sun's oblateness.

Relativistically, the gravitational field is produced not just by the mass but by the stress-energy tensor, so it also depends on things like the pressure and shear stresses.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 86 ·
3
Replies
86
Views
8K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
12K