Is the Yukawa Strong Nuclear Flux dependent on both gauge and radius?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Orion1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graviton Monopole
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Yukawa Strong Nuclear Flux and its dependence on gauge and radius, alongside the gravitic flux through closed surfaces. Participants explore the mathematical formulations and implications of these concepts within the context of gravitational and nuclear physics.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants present various equations related to gravitic and Yukawa flux, questioning the validity and completeness of these expressions. Some participants seek clarification on the definitions of terms like G_g and the context of integration over different surfaces.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing mathematical expressions and questioning the assumptions underlying the equations. There is a focus on the integration process and the implications of gauge dependence in the context of the Yukawa flux.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express concerns about the clarity and correctness of the equations presented, particularly regarding the integration limits and the physical interpretation of the flux equations. The discussion reflects a mix of established principles and speculative reasoning about the relationships between gauge and radius in flux calculations.

Orion1
Messages
961
Reaction score
3

What is the solution for a static graviton flux monopole through a closed surface? :rolleyes:

Sphere surface area:
dA = 4 \pi r^2
\Phi_G = \oint G_g \cdot dA = \oint G_g \cdot (4 \pi r^2)
[/Color]
 
Physics news on Phys.org

G_g is the gravitic field strength: (arbitrarily chosen symbol)
G_g
[/Color]
 
Are you talking about arbitrary closed surface or about sphere. If you are talking about sphere then it is quite simple:
First thing: Flux is \Phi=\oint_S \vec{G} \vec{dA}. Second thing \vec{dA} in spherical coordinates (which are most appropriate because problem has a spherical simmetry) is \vec{dA}=R^2\sin\theta d\phi d\theta\vec{e_r}. Integration is trivial because \vec{G}=\frac{\gamma m}{R^2}\vec{e_r}.
In case of arbitrary surface we have \oint_A \vec{G}\vec{dA'}=\int_V \nabla\vec{G}dV'=-\int_V \nabla^2{\phi_g}dV'=-\gamma m\int_V \nabla^2\frac{1}{|\vec{r}-\vec{r'}|} dV'=4\pi\gamma m\int_V \delta(\vec{r}-\vec{r'})dV'=4\pi\gamma m, where V is such that A=\partial V.
 
Last edited:

G_g = \frac{\gamma m}{r^2}

Gauss' Law for gravitation:
\Phi_g = - \left( \frac{\gamma m}{r^2} \right) (4 \pi r^2) = - 4 \pi \gamma m
\boxed{\Phi_g = - 4 \pi \gamma m}

\Phi_g = \oint_A \vec{G} \vec{dA} = - \oint_A \frac{\gamma m}{r^2} \vec{e_r} \cdot r^2 \sin \theta d\phi d\theta \vec{e_r} = - \gamma m \int_a^b \left[ \int_c^d \sin \theta d\phi \right] d\theta}
\boxed{\Phi_g = - \gamma m \int_a^b \left[ \int_c^d \sin \theta d\phi \right] d\theta}
[/Color]
 
Last edited:
First expression you wrote is meaningless. You should have some differential form under integration. Expression would be OK if you had integral sign removed. Third expression is OK but you didn't perform integration. You should integrate \theta in boundaries from 0 to \pi and \phi in boundaries from 0 to 2\pi.
 

\Phi_g = \oint_S \vec{G} \vec{dA} = - \int_0^{\pi} \left[ \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac{\gamma m}{r^2} \vec{e_r} \cdot r^2 \sin \theta d\phi \vec{e_r} \right] d\theta

- \int_0^{\pi} \left[ \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac{\gamma m}{r^2} \vec{e_r} \cdot r^2 \sin \theta d\phi \vec{e_r} \right] d\theta = - \gamma m \int_0^{\pi} \int_0^{2 \pi} \sin \theta d\phi d\theta = -2 \pi \gamma m \int_0^{\pi} \sin \theta d\theta

-2 \pi \gamma m \int_0^{\pi} \sin \theta d\theta = - 4 \pi \gamma m
\boxed{\Phi_g = - 4 \pi \gamma m}
[/Color]
 
Last edited:

These are my equations for Yukawa Flux.

g - gauge coupling constant
S_n - Yukawa strong nuclear field strength

Yukawa Strong Nuclear Flux:
S_n = - \frac{g}{e^{\frac{r}{r_0}} r^2}
\Phi_n = \oint_S S_n dA = - \int_0^{\pi} \left[ \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac{g}{ e^{\frac{r}{r_0}} r^2} \cdot r^2 \sin \theta d\phi \right] d\theta = - g \int_0^{\pi} \left[ \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac{\sin \theta}{e^{\frac{r}{r_0}}} d\phi \right] d\theta

- g \int_0^{\pi} \left[ \int_0^{2 \pi} \frac{\sin \theta}{e^{\frac{r}{r_0}}} d\phi \right] d\theta = - 2 \pi g \int_0^{\pi} \frac{\sin \theta}{e^{\frac{r}{r_0}}} d\theta = - \frac{4 \pi g}{e^{\frac{r}{r_0}}}

\boxed{\Phi_n = - \frac{4 \pi g}{e^{\frac{r}{r_0}}}}

However, every other flux through a closed surface, such as Maxwell's equations and Gauss' Law for gravitation is only dependent on gauge. This flux equation is dependent on both gauge and radius. Are these equations correct?
[/Color]
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K