Gravity-Nuclear force relation

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter deepthishan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Relation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the relationship between nuclear energy and gravity, particularly focusing on whether gravity has any significant effect on nuclear power plants and nuclear reactions. The scope includes conceptual inquiries and practical implications related to nuclear energy generation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that gravity's effects are negligible in the context of nuclear energy generation, as other fundamental forces dominate at low energy levels.
  • Others argue that while gravity affects all physical systems, including nuclear power plants, its role is not unique or significant compared to other types of power plants.
  • A participant notes that newer nuclear power plant designs utilize gravity for emergency cooling systems, indicating a practical application of gravitational effects.
  • There is a claim that the nuclear reactions in the reactor core would function similarly without the influence of an external gravitational field.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the significance of gravity in nuclear energy contexts, with no consensus on its relevance or impact on nuclear reactions specifically.

Contextual Notes

Some statements rely on assumptions about the magnitude of gravitational effects compared to other forces, and the discussion does not resolve the implications of gravity in nuclear physics or engineering.

deepthishan
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
Is there a relation between Nuclear energy and Gravity? If so, can you please explain what that is and why? If not, why not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your question is somewhat unclear, so not sure how to respond. In nuclear physics, at least in the low energy regime, gravity does not really come into play simply because its effects are orders of magnitude smaller than those of the other fundamental forces. Of course there is gravitational attraction between the various particles that make up an atomic nucleus, but it is so small as to be negligible so far as nuclear energy generation is concerned.
 
I'm sorry Markus - more directly, I meant any effect of the Earth's Gravitational field on a Nuclear powerplant.
 
Yes, but no more or less than a coal power plant or a cookie factory. Gravity affects everything the same.
 
First generation nuclear power plants use pumps to pump cooling water into the reactor core. If the electric supply is interrupted for any reason such as a tsunami for a time longer than the battery backup will cover, the core will meltdown. Newer designs suspend emergency cooling water above the reactor relying on the Earth's gravity to feed it into the core.
 
What does that have to do with the question?
 
deepthishan said:
I'm sorry Markus - more directly, I meant any effect of the Earth's Gravitational field on a Nuclear powerplant.

There is no direct effect apart from the plant staying put where it is instead of floating off into space, and all the mechanics of the plant working as they are supposed to. In terms of the actual nuclear reactions taking place in the core, they would work just as well without the presence of an external gravitational field.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K