Great Magic Triangle Math Puzzle

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jedishrfu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Magic Puzzle Triangle
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Great Magic Triangle Math Puzzle illustrates an optical illusion involving two configurations of shapes that appear to form a right-angled triangle but are actually quadrangles. The discussion highlights that the original shape is not a triangle, as evidenced by the differing slopes of the hypotenuses and the internal vertex placement. Participants emphasize the importance of using textual descriptions and geometric axioms over visual inspection to avoid misconceptions. The puzzle serves as a teaching tool for problem-solving and reasoning in geometry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of geometric figures and their properties
  • Familiarity with optical illusions in mathematics
  • Basic knowledge of angle trisection and its common pitfalls
  • Experience with visual proofs and their limitations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of quadrangles and their distinctions from triangles
  • Explore the concept of angle trisection and its mathematical challenges
  • Learn about optical illusions in geometry and their educational applications
  • Investigate methods for verifying geometric proofs through multiple approaches
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students in geometry, and anyone interested in understanding optical illusions and their implications in mathematical reasoning.

Messages
15,615
Reaction score
10,393
This is quite an interesting puzzle. You know it's wrong but you don't know why by inspection:

The missing square puzzle is an optical illusion used in mathematics classes to help students reason about geometrical figures; or rather to teach them not to reason using figures, but to use only textual descriptions and the axioms of geometry.

It depicts two arrangements made of similar shapes in slightly different configurations. Each apparently forms a 13×5 right-angled triangle, but one has a 1×1 hole in it. [source]

http://twistedsifter.com/2017/07/profs-use-this-puzzle-to-teach-lesson-about-problem-solving/

Can you figure out an easy way to inspect it?

I spotted one way.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: QuantumQuest and Charles Link
Mathematics news on Phys.org
##2/5\neq 3/8##

The original shape is not a triangle.

Edit: You can also rather easily see that the original vertex where the smaller triangles meet is inside the second shape and not on its border. This only works if like here you have access to the grid.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: QuantumQuest, Laurie K, StoneTemplePython and 1 other person
Yeah that's what I noticed after staring at it for awhile that putting the smaller triangle inside the larger one and using the grid you can see they aren't similar.

It reminds me of the common failure of many trisection angle constructions where you can't prove that three intersecting arcs/lines cross at the same point and consequently the proof fails.
 
I'm a formula guy. Some basic computations show that both triangles are quadrangles. Or: the long side isn't differentiable on neither figure.
 
Playing around with "equivalent" angles and tangents got me the same ##\frac{2}{5} \neq \frac{3}{8}##

If you take a belt and suspenders approach with proofs -- i.e. have a proof two independent ways of proving / verifying something-- then picture proofs frequently make a nice set of suspenders.
 
I recently saw similar "paradox" regarding an infinite chocolate bar... I'm not good with math proof but I could tell the bar was shorter after you remove a piece.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Charles Link and MarchJanuary
Orodruin said:
The original shape is not a triangle.
As a former fence and deck builder, this was apparent by eyeballing down the long sides of each "triangle", where A appears concaved and B appears convexed.

Edit: You don't need the grid for this inspection.
 
Last edited:
stoomart said:
As a former fence and deck builder, this was apparent by eyeballing down the long sides of each "triangle", where A appears concaved and B appears convexed.

Edit: You don't need the grid for this inspection.
I saw the same thing. Here are the triangles overlaid:
Magic_triangle.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: stoomart
I noticed that the hypotenuse "slope" of the second triangle goes a little bit higher, that means it's not a perfect triangle.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 96 ·
4
Replies
96
Views
12K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
15
Views
41K