Loren Booda
- 3,115
- 4
Up to the present, what concept formulated here on Physics Forums do you consider the most outstanding?
The discussion revolves around identifying the greatest scientific contributions made within the Physics Forums community, with a focus on various concepts, debates, and humorous exchanges related to physics and mathematics.
Participants express a mix of humorous and serious contributions, with no clear consensus on what constitutes the greatest scientific contribution. Multiple competing views and topics remain unresolved.
Some statements reflect humor or sarcasm, and there are indications of misunderstanding or miscommunication among participants regarding serious scientific topics.
Ivan Seeking said:How to nail jello to a tree.
Cyrus said:How do you nail Jello to a tree?
"Sorry - no matches. Please try some different terms."Pengwuino said:Greatest scientific contributions?
https://www.physicsforums.com/search.php?searchid=1540622
Pengwuino said:Oh damn it :( It was suppose to link to all my posts :P
humanino said:You mean like https://www.physicsforums.com/search.php?do=finduser&u=14824 ?
russ_watters said:Quite obviously, our major contribution to science is in our research of fish slapping.
Cyrus said:How do you nail Jello to a tree?
I captured the moon in a bucket of water once.WhoWee said:While visiting my sister's restaurant one afternoon, one of the employees (carrying a stainless steel bucket) pulled me to the side and inquired how he might capture steam in his bucket? I replied "HUH"...and investigated further.
Apparently, someone had sent him across the street to McDonald's (with the bucket) to request they fill it with steam...to do some cleaning.
I looked around to make sure the joke wasn't on me (it wasn't)...so... I suggested he visit PF to seek assistance.
Did anyone help the young lad?
Well, photons in a bucket full of liquid helium below the superconducting critical temperature do have a mass. This bucket would very much look like filled with steam. Both statements are still valid in a falling elevator, at least until impact.Hootenanny said:I think it was that wonderful debate on whether a photon has mass.
humanino said:Well, photons in a bucket full of liquid helium below the superconducting critical temperature do have a mass. This bucket would very much look like filled with steam. Both statements are still valid in a falling elevator, at least until impact.
You may be thinking about this: http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0404086Ivan Seeking said:Perhaps someone else remembers the reference. I recall that PF was cited in a published physics paper.
jimmysnyder said:In the area of Mathematics, I think PF has been instrumental in settling the 1 = .999... controversy.
You are so funny!humanino said:Well, photons in a bucket full of liquid helium below the superconducting critical temperature do have a mass. This bucket would very much look like filled with steam. Both statements are still valid in a falling elevator, at least until impact.
Until Zz pops in and notices that I crackpotedly claimed that superfluid Helium is superconductor.Evo said:You are so funny!![]()