Greatest scientific contribution on Physics Forums?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
28 replies · 4K views
Loren Booda
Messages
3,115
Reaction score
4
Up to the present, what concept formulated here on Physics Forums do you consider the most outstanding?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ivan Seeking said:
How to nail jello to a tree.

How do you nail Jello to a tree?
 
.....damn. DENIED.
 
To quote Stewie Griffin, of Family Guy to one of his minions:

SG: "...and cut me some water!"
M: "Sir, we can't cut water"
SG: "Do I need to do all the thinking?! Freeze the water and then cut it!"
 
Dealing with the Girl's trouble?
 
Solving the plane on a treadmill fiasco.
 
Greatest scientific contributions?

https://www.physicsforums.com/search.php?searchid=1540622
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pengwuino said:
Greatest scientific contributions?

https://www.physicsforums.com/search.php?searchid=1540622
"Sorry - no matches. Please try some different terms."
If it's a joke, it's a pretty good one. :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh damn it :( It was suppose to link to all my posts :P
 
Pengwuino said:
Oh damn it :( It was suppose to link to all my posts :P

You mean like https://www.physicsforums.com/search.php?do=finduser&u=14824 ?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
humanino said:
You mean like https://www.physicsforums.com/search.php?do=finduser&u=14824 ?

That guy doesn't know sh!t from shinola.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
russ_watters said:
Quite obviously, our major contribution to science is in our research of fish slapping.

My version of string theory is on a 16-manifold where little invisible fish slap strings that cause them to vibrate in different ways.
 
Cyrus said:
How do you nail Jello to a tree?

with a massively parallel nail gun set for limited penetration
 
In the area of Mathematics, I think PF has been instrumental in settling the 1 = .999... controversy.
 
Last edited:
While visiting my sister's restaurant one afternoon, one of the employees (carrying a stainless steel bucket) pulled me to the side and inquired how he might capture steam in his bucket? I replied "HUH"...and investigated further.

Apparently, someone had sent him across the street to McDonald's (with the bucket) to request they fill it with steam...to do some cleaning.

I looked around to make sure the joke wasn't on me (it wasn't)...so... I suggested he visit PF to seek assistance.

Did anyone help the young lad?
 
WhoWee said:
While visiting my sister's restaurant one afternoon, one of the employees (carrying a stainless steel bucket) pulled me to the side and inquired how he might capture steam in his bucket? I replied "HUH"...and investigated further.

Apparently, someone had sent him across the street to McDonald's (with the bucket) to request they fill it with steam...to do some cleaning.

I looked around to make sure the joke wasn't on me (it wasn't)...so... I suggested he visit PF to seek assistance.

Did anyone help the young lad?
I captured the moon in a bucket of water once.
 
Hootenanny said:
I think it was that wonderful debate on whether a photon has mass.
Well, photons in a bucket full of liquid helium below the superconducting critical temperature do have a mass. This bucket would very much look like filled with steam. Both statements are still valid in a falling elevator, at least until impact.
 
humanino said:
Well, photons in a bucket full of liquid helium below the superconducting critical temperature do have a mass. This bucket would very much look like filled with steam. Both statements are still valid in a falling elevator, at least until impact.
:smile: :smile: :smile:
 
:confused:I have the impression,possibly mistaken,that some respondents are giving flippant answers to this important question.It is time to inject a serious note into the proceedings....hemisemidemiquaver.
 
jimmysnyder said:
In the area of Mathematics, I think PF has been instrumental in settling the 1 = .999... controversy.

Yeah you have to be pretty silly to believe that 1=0.999...

Before anyone takes me seriously, I am joking about.
 
humanino said:
Well, photons in a bucket full of liquid helium below the superconducting critical temperature do have a mass. This bucket would very much look like filled with steam. Both statements are still valid in a falling elevator, at least until impact.
You are so funny! :smile:
 
Evo said:
You are so funny! :smile:
Until Zz pops in and notices that I crackpotedly claimed that superfluid Helium is superconductor.