Green Function and Boundary Conditions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the Green function for a wave equation in a 2D rectangular cavity, specifically addressing how to incorporate boundary conditions into the solution process. The focus is on the mathematical formulation and techniques for solving the equation with imposed constraints.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the equation -∂μ ∂μ φ = K and notes the boundary conditions G|_0 = G|_a = 0 for the Green function.
  • Another participant suggests that each Fourier component of g(z) must vanish at the boundaries z=0 and z=a, implying the use of sine functions with specific frequencies.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about when to apply the boundary conditions in the solution process, particularly after transforming the equation using Fourier methods.
  • A resource is shared that may provide insights into incorporating boundary conditions within the contour method for solving Green's functions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the use of sine functions for the solution, but there is uncertainty regarding the specific steps for applying boundary conditions in the solution process. The discussion remains unresolved on the exact methodology for incorporating these conditions.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the mathematical steps involved in applying boundary conditions, and there may be dependencies on definitions and assumptions related to the Fourier components and the nature of the Green function.

robousy
Messages
332
Reaction score
1
Hey folks,

I'm trying to find the Green function for the equation
-\partial_\mu \partial^\mu \phi = K
where K is some source term. Its a 2D problem with the wave confined to a rectangular cavity where the cavity is located at z = 0 and z=a.
This tells me that G|_0= G|_a=0

I've pretty much solved this problem for the case of NO boundary conditions, eg an infinite wave, I'm just stuck on where to put in info on the BC's.

I am confident I have derived the following expression correctly as it matches with a book I am using:

(-\partial_z^2-\lambda^2)g(z,z')=\delta(z-z')

where \lambda^2=\omega^2-k^2

So really this is the problem I need to solve - where g is the reduced Greens function.
I can solve this by taking the FT and using contour integrals...pretty standard, but this is for an infinite wave. My question is 'where and how do I impose boundary conditions for g(0,z')=g(a,z')=0 ??'.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My rough guess is that you have to demand that each Fourier component or "mode" of g(z) vanishes at z=0 and z=a. That means you have to use sines (because they are all zero at z=0) with specific allowed frequencies so that they are zero also at z=a.
 
Hi smallphi, yes the solution is sines - I'm just hoping to find out how to put in the BCs. Eg - what's the next step in solving (-\partial_z^2-\lambda^2)g(z,zsingle-quote)=\delta(z-zsingle-quote).<br /> <br /> Like I said I've done this by Fourier transforming then solving using contour method. But I'm not sure at what stage to use the BC's.
 
The freeware version of 'Introduction to quantum fields in classical backgrounds' by S. Winitzki and V. Mukhanov:

http://homepages.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~Winitzki/T6/book.pdf

contain an appendix A2: Green's functions, boundary conditions and contours,

which may shed some light on how to incorporate the boundary conditions in the contour method.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thats a very nice link. Great looking book. Thansk a lot smallphi!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K