A question about boundary conditions in Green's functions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of boundary conditions in solving differential equations using Green's functions. The first problem involves the equation y'' - 4y' + 3y = f(x) with boundary conditions y(0) = y'(0) = 0, where the user questions the validity of assuming y(x) = 0 leads to A = B = 0. The second problem, y'' + 4y' + 3x = e^-2x, also has boundary conditions y(0) = y'(0) = 0, and the user struggles with convergence issues in their integral setup. The professor clarifies a typo in the boundary conditions, emphasizing the importance of correctly applying them in Green's function solutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Green's functions in differential equations
  • Familiarity with boundary value problems
  • Knowledge of convergence criteria for integrals
  • Proficiency in solving second-order linear differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of Green's functions for various boundary conditions
  • Learn about convergence tests for improper integrals
  • Explore the method of undetermined coefficients in solving differential equations
  • Investigate the implications of boundary conditions on the uniqueness of solutions
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in applied mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with differential equations and Green's functions, particularly those dealing with boundary value problems.

BiGyElLoWhAt
Gold Member
Messages
1,637
Reaction score
138
I have a couple homework questions, and I'm getting caught up in boundary applications. For the first one, I have y'' - 4y' + 3y = f(x) and I need to find the Green's function.
I also have the boundary conditions y(x)=y'(0)=0. Is this possible? Wouldn't y(x)=0 be of the form of a solution? Should this be y(x_0)? I assumed that it was correct, but then getting into the boundary condition application for G(x,z), I'm not sure what to do. Can I limit this boundary condition to one half of my G? So when I have
...{Ae^3x + Be^x for z<x
G = {
...{Ce^3x + De^x for x<z

Can I use y(x) = 0 to say A=B=0? Or do I need to treat y(x) as a single point, and evaluate at that point, then set it equal to zero (In which case A and B would be functions of (x_0) ).

For another problem, I have y'' + 4y' +3x = e^-2x and y(0)=y'(0)=0.
I think I'm either not applying the boundaries correctly in solving for my coefficients, or in setting up the integral, as I ended up with a nonconvergant integral. I'm relatively certain that I solved for the constants correctly. I think it's arbitrary which set I use in setting y and y' = 0. At least I can't think of a good reason why It should matter. I chose A=B=0 (that's what you get when you set y and y' = 0 for z<x)
Then when you apply the continuity conditions (##G(z,z)_+ - G(z,z)_- = 0\ \text{and} \ G'(z,z)_+ - G'(z,z)_- = 1##) You end up with C=1/2 e^z and D = -1/2 e^3z. Now, when I multiply both of these by f(z) = e^-2z I effectively have an integral of the form e^-z -e^z, the first part converges, but the second doesn't. This is of course assuming my limits (x, ifty) are correct. I'm not sure I understand exactly how to get my limits. My reasoning for this is that since in my initial assumption I chose z<x to contain my y(0) boundary and we don't have another boundary in y (only in y'), so therefore I need to integrate from 0 to x (which is 0) and from x to infinity (since there is a discontinuity at x).

Can anyone shed some light? My book seems to just get them from somewhere. We assume a solution of the form int [G(x,z)f(z)] from a to b with a and b being gotten from the boundary conditions, but in examples where you have one y boundary and one y' boundary, it seems as though one of the limits is infinity. This should have a fairly simple solution (as I did one earlier of the same form without using green's functions).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I got ahold of my professor, and y(x)=y'(0)=0 is a typo, and should be y(0)=y'(0) = 0. The second question still stands, however.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K