Green's function for Sturm-Louiville ODE

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the Green's function for the Sturm-Liouville ordinary differential equation (ODE) given by $$(p(x)y')' + q(x)y = 0$$ with specific functions defined as ##p(x) = 1-x^2## and ##q(x) = 2-1/(1-x^2)##. The associated Legendre polynomials ##P_1^1## and ##Q_1^1## are identified as solutions, but the existence of a Green's function is challenged due to the unbounded nature of the second solution at the boundary. The conclusion reached is that a Green's function does not exist for this problem under the given conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Sturm-Liouville theory
  • Familiarity with associated Legendre polynomials
  • Knowledge of boundary value problems
  • Proficiency in differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Sturm-Liouville operators
  • Learn about the construction of Green's functions in boundary value problems
  • Explore the eigenvalue problem for Sturm-Liouville equations
  • Investigate the role of weight functions in Sturm-Liouville theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with differential equations, particularly those dealing with boundary value problems and Sturm-Liouville theory.

member 428835
Hi PF!

Given the following ODE $$(p(x)y')' + q(x)y = 0$$ where ##p(x) = 1-x^2## and ##q(x) = 2-1/(1-x^2)## subject to $$y'(a) + \sec(a)\tan(a)y(a) = 0$$ and $$|y(b)| < \infty,$$ where ##a = \sqrt{1-\cos^2\alpha} : \alpha \in (0,\pi)## and ##b = 1##, what is the Green's function?

This is the associated Legendre ODE, which admits two linearly independent solutions: $$y_1 = P_1^1, \,\,\, y_1 = Q_1^1$$ where ##P_1^1## and ##Q_1^1## are associated Legendre polynomials first and second kind respectively. Things now get a little murky: notice ##y_1## automatically satisfies ##y_1'(a) + \sec(a)\tan(a)y_1(a) = 0##, but ##y_2(b) = \infty##. If ##y_2(b)## was bounded, the Green's function would be very simple to calculate. But it's not bounded, so I'm confused how to proceed?

Any help is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want a solution bounded at 1, then you are limited to scalar multiples of P_1^1: <br /> G(x;x_0) = \begin{cases}<br /> AP_1^1(x) &amp; x \leq x_0 \\<br /> BP_1^1(x) &amp; x &gt; x_0\end{cases}. The conditions you need to satisfy are <br /> \begin{split}<br /> (A - B)P_1^1(x_0) &amp;= 0 \\<br /> (A - B){P_1^1}&#039;(x_0) &amp;= \frac{1}{p(x_0)}\end{split} which cannot be done unless P_1^1(x_0) = 0 or you are prepared to relax the constraint that G(\cdot;x_0) be continuous at x_0.
 
I appreciate your reply. So it looks like a Green's function doesn't exist for this problem, right?
 
joshmccraney said:
I appreciate your reply. So it looks like a Green's function doesn't exist for this problem, right?

Yes.

The way to solve the non-homogenous boundary value problem <br /> L(y) = (py&#039;)&#039; + qy = -g on the interval [a,b] subject to arbitrary boundary conditions on y is to first solve the eigenvalue problem <br /> L(\phi) = -\lambda w \phi for a convenient weight function w which is strictly positive on (a,b) with \phi subject to a convenient self-adjoint boundary condition. This gives you a discrete spectrum of eigenvalues \lambda_n \neq 0 with corresponding eigenfunctions \phi_n which are orthogonal with respect to the inner product (f,g)_w = \int_a^b f(x)g(x) w(x)\,dx.

(In this case, choosing a suitable boundary condition and setting w = 1 will give \phi_n = P_n^1 with \lambda_n = n(n+1) - 2 for n \geq 2.)

Next, look for a particular solution y_P = \sum_n a_n \phi_n so that <br /> L(y_P) = -\sum_na_n\lambda_n w \phi_n = -g and then multiplying by \phi_m and integrating you should find<br /> a_m = \frac{1}{\lambda_m \|\phi_m\|_w^2}\int_a^b g(x)\phi_m(x)\,dx. A complimentary function y_C \in \ker L can then be added to y_P in order to satisfy the boundary conditions on y.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K