Green's function for the wave equation

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Green's function in the context of the 1-dimensional wave equation, specifically addressing boundary conditions and the implications of the Green's function vanishing at certain points. Participants explore the mathematical formulation of the solution and its dependence on boundary conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks clarification on the requirement for the Green's function to vanish at an endpoint when the spatial solution is specified at that endpoint.
  • Another participant suggests that the solution can be expressed as an integral involving the Green's function and an inhomogeneity, emphasizing the importance of the Green's function vanishing at the boundary to satisfy boundary conditions.
  • A different perspective is introduced, arguing that if the inhomogeneity vanishes at the endpoint, the integral could still satisfy the boundary condition, leading to confusion about the necessity of the Green's function's behavior at the boundary.
  • A correction is made regarding the evaluation of variables at the boundary, clarifying that the focus should be on the boundary condition for the spatial variable rather than the integration variable.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the Green's function vanishing at the boundary and the role of the inhomogeneity in satisfying boundary conditions. The discussion remains unresolved with competing interpretations of the mathematical requirements.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the dependence on specific boundary conditions and the roles of different variables in the formulation of the solution. There are unresolved aspects regarding the assumptions made about the inhomogeneity and its behavior at the boundary.

dRic2
Gold Member
Messages
887
Reaction score
225
Hi, I'm reading "Wave Physics" by S. Nettel and in chapter 3 he introduces the Green's function for the 1-dimensional wave equation. Using the separation of variables method he restricts his attention to the spatial component only. Let ##u(x)## be the spatial solution to the wave equation and ##G(x|x_0)## the Green's function. The author now states the following:

Let us now suppose that it is ##u(x)## that is specified at an end point. Then we must choose ##G(x|x_o)## to vanish at that end point.

I don't really understand this connection. Can someone help me ?

Thanks
Ric
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are looking to write down the solution on the form
$$
u(x) = \int G(x|x_0) \kappa(x_0) dx_0 + f(x)
$$
where ##\kappa## is the inhomogeneity in your wave equation and ##f(x)## solves the homogeneous wave equation and satisfies your boundary conditions. If ##G(x|x_0)## does not vanish at the boundary, then the integral will generally not be zero there and your function will not satisfy the boundary conditions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Cryo
In the book I'm reading there is a slightly different version of the solution:

244190


(forget about the ##\frac 1 {\rho}##)

BTW I also do not understand your answer. If, for example, ##k## vanishes at the end point the integral could also be zero and the boundary condition would be verified.
 
dRic2 said:
If, for example, ##k## vanishes at the end point the integral could also be zero and the boundary condition would be verified.
No, this is incorrect. The point is to evaluate ##x## at the boundary, not ##x_0##, which is an integration variable.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dRic2
Sorry, dumb mistake. Now I get your argument, thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K