What defines a wave according to the wave equation?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter FAS1998
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave Wave equation
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the definition of a wave in the context of the wave equation, particularly focusing on the implications of the general solution of the one-dimensional wave equation and whether waves must be cyclical or periodic. Participants explore theoretical aspects and conceptual clarifications regarding wave behavior as described by the wave equation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that a system can be described as a wave if it follows the wave equation, referencing the general solution u(x,t) = F(x - ct) + G(x + ct).
  • One participant questions the connection between this solution and the traditional understanding of waves, specifically whether waves need to be cyclical or periodic.
  • Another participant suggests a definition of a wave as "a distortion that propagates without changing shape," which may imply a broader interpretation of wave behavior.
  • A later reply discusses the mathematical properties of the wave equation and suggests that solutions can be cyclic in the complex plane, although this does not directly address the periodicity of real-world waves.
  • Some participants argue that waves do not need to be periodic, using the example of a single disturbance in water to illustrate that non-repetitive disturbances can still be described by the wave equation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on whether waves must be cyclical or periodic, with some asserting that they do not need to be, while others maintain that cyclical behavior is a characteristic of waves. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the necessity of periodicity in defining waves.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference mathematical formulations and definitions, but there are unresolved assumptions regarding the implications of these definitions on the nature of waves. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the definition of a wave.

FAS1998
Messages
49
Reaction score
1
If I’m not mistaken, a system can be described as a wave if it follows the wave equation.

On Wikipedia, the general solution for the one-dimensional wave equation is written as u(x,t) = F(x - ct) + G(x + ct).

I don’t see the connection between this solution and what I understand waves to be. Don’t waves need to by cyclical? This general solution doesn’t seem to require the functions to be periodic or cyclical in any sense. What would be a good description of a wave according to the wave equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps (for the 1D case): " A distortion that propagates without changing shape "
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FAS1998
FAS1998 said:
If I’m not mistaken, a system can be described as a wave if it follows the wave equation.

On Wikipedia, the general solution for the one-dimensional wave equation is written as u(x,t) = F(x - ct) + G(x + ct).

I don’t see the connection between this solution and what I understand waves to be. Don’t waves need to by cyclical? This general solution doesn’t seem to require the functions to be periodic or cyclical in any sense. What would be a good description of a wave according to the wave equation?
Differentiation turns multiplication into addition, the linear approximation: ##d(f\cdot g) = f\cdot dg + g\cdot df##. Integration does the opposite and turns addition into multiplication, which is why we use the exponential function as template for solutions: ##\exp(x+y)=\exp(x) \cdot \exp(y)##. This is roughly what's going on.

Now the wave equation is ##y''+y=0##. If we set ##y=ae^{cx}## then we get ##ac^2+a=0##. We are not interested in the solution ##a=0##, so we have ##c=\pm i## instead, and ##y=ae^{\pm i cx}## which is a circle in the complex plane and ##y## thus a cyclic function.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FAS1998
FAS1998 said:
On Wikipedia, the general solution for the one-dimensional wave equation is written as u(x,t) = F(x - ct) + G(x + ct).

I don’t see the connection between this solution and what I understand waves to be. Don’t waves need to by cyclical? This general solution doesn’t seem to require the functions to be periodic or cyclical in any sense.

Did you look further down to
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_equation#Plane_wave_eigenmodes
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FAS1998
FAS1998 said:
Don’t waves need to by cyclical?
No, they don't need to be periodic (the usual term for what I assume you mean by "cyclical.").

Consider the disturbance that you produce on the surface of water in a pond or bathtub when you poke your finger into the water and withdraw it quickly, once. This is described by the same differential wave equation as the periodic disturbance that you get when you poke your finger into the water and withdraw it, many times at regular intervals.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FAS1998 and jim mcnamara

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K