Complaint Gross Negligence in Discussions of Dangerous Knowledge

  • Thread starter Thread starter Psyop
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the appropriateness of moderators blocking conversations about dangerous safety flaws in devices on a forum. One participant argues that this censorship could be seen as gross negligence, as it prevents knowledgeable individuals from potentially preventing harm. However, others emphasize the importance of safety and the risks associated with discussing dangerous activities online, particularly for inexperienced experimenters. The moderators' actions are supported by the community to maintain a safe environment, and it is suggested that individuals seek local resources for guidance instead. Overall, the conversation highlights the balance between open discussion and ensuring safety in potentially hazardous topics.
Psyop
Messages
2
Reaction score
6
"We do not discuss dangerous activities here on the PF."
berkeman

Is it appropriate for an individual moderator to block the open discussion of what I feel could be a dangerous safety flaw in a device?
I would propose that by not allowing those with the knowledge to reply and possibly save many people from harm shows gross negligence by the moderator.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Psyop said:
"We do not discuss dangerous activities here on the PF."
berkeman

Is it appropriate for an individual moderator to block the open discussion of what I feel could be a dangerous safety flaw in a device?
I would propose that by not allowing those with the knowledge to reply and possibly save many people from harm shows gross negligence by the moderator.

https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/component-reliability.785817/

Your DIY group doing electrical experiments on themselves is generally not a good idea. It is good that you want to understand the dangers and try to point them out to them, but discussing them on a web forum is probably not the best way for you to proceed. Please check out the UL 544 Medical Device Safety specification that I mentioned in the thread, and perhaps find a local EE resource who has a biomedical background to discuss the issues involved.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy
Psyop said:
Is it appropriate for an individual moderator to block the open discussion of what I feel could be a dangerous safety flaw in a device?

There is often some contention about what the mods do here, both individually and as a group, but here's the thing ... PF is the best science forum on the Internet and a big reason for that is that time and effort put in by the mods, who do all this for nothing more than the love and kisses that we blow their way, along with the occasional cuss word, and their own sense of satisfaction at being helpful.

I can understand your annoyance and an attempt to change/improve things is welcome, but at the end of the day, PF is what it is.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy, John M. Carr and berkeman
Psyop said:
Is it appropriate for an individual moderator to block the open discussion of what I feel could be a dangerous safety flaw in a device?
Although actions are taken by individual mentors, we discuss the close calls among ourselves first and you can safely assume that any action has the support of the entire mentors' community. This one certainly does, and it does because...

I would propose that by not allowing those with the knowledge to reply and possibly save many people from harm shows gross negligence by the moderator.
Unfortunately any reply of the form "If you're going to do it, here's how to do it safely" is going to be heard by someone out there as "It's OK to do it as long as you do it this way" and that's just asking for trouble.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50 and Danger
Thank you for the well put responses, and for providing the opportunity and platform to voice my grievances.
You have all made solid points and recommendations. I now see how an open forum is not the best place to pursue this topic.
This is a great forum, I see lots of interesting work being done here. Hopefully in the future I will have a less controversial subject to come to the experts with.
Your time is appreciated.
 
  • Like
Likes gracy, Danger, dlgoff and 3 others
This is an older Feedback thread, but our policies here have not changed, and there have been a couple unfortunate reminders in the news lately about why it is so important to stress safety to inexperienced experimenters, especially young people.

Pretty sad...

http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/ohio-boy-electrocuted-conducting-youtube-experiment-38537056
Oliver said the high school freshman apparently was trying to conduct an experiment called Jacob's Ladder involving a high-voltage traveling arc of electricity between two points.

Authorities found a battery pack from a microwave oven attached to an electrical outlet by extension cords, with jumper cables going from the battery pack to two pieces of a wire hanger. The hanger pieces apparently were intended to be used as the points for the electricity to travel along, Oliver said.
Various websites discussing Jacob's Ladder warn it can be dangerous and should not be done at home.

Oliver said the experiment wasn't part of any school assignment.

"He was doing this on his own," the deputy said.
 
  • Like
Likes dlgoff
And a couple honors high school students who got surprised. That could have been me. Have I told you about the time I almost blew up my ChemE roommate in college? Lesson learned...

https://www.yahoo.com/news/1-dead-1-hurt-model-rocket-explodes-school-084933712.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes dlgoff
I wonder if it would be a good idea to refer members finding themselves in such a situation to a local hackerspace.
The bigger spaces usually have some people around that can help with safety considerations and even mentor them in their pursuit of knowledge.

Of course this doesn't apply to anybody as they don't exist everywhere. In Belgium I know knew of two before I googled some more.
This one seemed great from the virtual tour we got during a stream by freecodecamp (great opensource initiative).

Might be something to consider.
 

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
6K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
502K
Back
Top