Group Homomorphism: Definition & Examples

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Sumanta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of group homomorphisms, particularly the possibility of defining a homomorphism as a sum of individual homomorphisms indexed by an infinite set. Participants explore the implications of such definitions within group theory and seek clarification on whether this can be generalized beyond finite cases.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if a homomorphism can be expressed as a sum of homomorphisms indexed by an infinite set, specifically asking how this would be defined.
  • Another participant introduces the concept of free abelian groups and suggests that it may be reasonable to consider a homomorphism as a sum of individual homomorphisms from groups to a smaller direct sum of integers.
  • A participant expresses uncertainty about whether arbitrary sums of homomorphisms converge to a homomorphism, noting that while this holds for finite cases, the infinite case is less clear.
  • Further clarification is provided regarding the operation of homomorphisms and the conditions under which sums can be defined, particularly in relation to convergence and the structure of the groups involved.
  • One participant provides an example involving real numbers to illustrate a specific case where the sum of homomorphisms yields an identity function, but acknowledges the complexity introduced by non-constant sequences.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity and definition of summing homomorphisms over infinite index sets. There is no consensus on whether such a concept is generally applicable, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the conditions necessary for such definitions to hold.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the discussion may require additional considerations from topology and convergence, indicating that the mathematical framework for defining such sums is not straightforward and may depend on specific properties of the groups involved.

Sumanta
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I understand the fact that grp theory textbooks defined Hom(G, H) as (g + h) u forms a group homomorphism. I wanted to know if there is any notion of homomorphism as [itex]\Sigma_{I} g_{i}[/itex] where each [itex]g_{i}[/itex] is a homomorphism and I is an infinite index set. If so how is it defined.

Thx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Just as an example, there are objects called free abelian groups which are groups isomorphic to [itex]\bigoplus_{i \in I} \mathbb{Z}[/itex] for some index set I.

So I think it makes sense to talk about a homomorphism [itex]g=\sum_I g_i[/itex] where [itex]g_i:G_i\to \mathbb{Z}[/itex] for some [itex]G_i[/itex] (or some groups can probably map to a "smaller" direct sum of Z). It should be a relatively straight-forward proof.

edit: I'm not sure if I answered the correct question. Are you asking if arbitrary sums of homomorphisms converge to a homomorphism? If I is finite, then yes, it is true. I wouldn't even know where to begin in the infinite case.
 
Last edited:
Sumanta said:
Hi,

I understand the fact that grp theory textbooks defined Hom(G, H) as (g + h) u forms a group homomorphism.
I can't make grammatical sense out of that question. I think your are trying to say that the set of all homomorphism from G to H can be made a group by defining the operation g+ h by (g+ h)(u)= g(u)+ h(u) where the sum on the right is the group operation in H.

Certainly, given an operation, you can repeat that operation a finite number of times, but that is not the point here. The operation in any group is a "binary" operation that applies to two members of the group at a time.

I wanted to know if there is any notion of homomorphism as [itex]\Sigma_{I} g_{i}[/itex] where each [itex]g_{i}[/itex] is a homomorphism and I is an infinite index set. If so how is it defined.

Thx
 
Hi,

Actually I think daveyp225 understood my question.

Suppose u have a finite product of groups say [itex]\Pi G_{i}[/itex] where the index set is finite.
And needless to say there exists from each of these a homomorphism [itex]g_{i}[/itex] to H.

So now u could define g: [itex]\Pi G_{i}[/itex] to H as

[itex]\Sigma g_{i}(u_{i})[/itex].

Can this be extended so that the index set is infinite. ie is [itex]\Sigma g_{i}(u_{i})[/itex] a valid concept at all.


Thx
 
Sumanta said:
Hi,

Actually I think daveyp225 understood my question.

Suppose u have a finite product of groups say [itex]\Pi G_{i}[/itex] where the index set is finite.
And needless to say there exists from each of these a homomorphism [itex]g_{i}[/itex] to H.

So now u could define g: [itex]\Pi G_{i}[/itex] to H as

[itex]\Sigma g_{i}(u_{i})[/itex].

Can this be extended so that the index set is infinite. ie is [itex]\Sigma g_{i}(u_{i})[/itex] a valid concept at all.

Thx

Here's what I think. In special cases, yes. In general though, [itex]g_i(k) = h_i[/itex] is an element of of [itex]H[/itex], but you'd first have to know that [itex]\sum_i h_i[/itex] even makes sense to write down. Then you can try to talk about whether or not the sum makes sense for all of the domain. This shows that to work in general, your space needs to have (among other things) an idea of an "accumulation point" as in pointset topology. In addition, you'll need that convergence in Hom(G,H) makes sense.

Here's one example: Let [itex]G_i = (\mathbb{R},+), H=(\mathbb{R},+), I = \mathbb{N}[/itex].

Define [itex]g_i(x) = \frac{x}{2^i}[/itex]. Then each [itex]g_i[/itex] is a homomorphism from [itex]\mathbb{R}[/itex] to [itex]\mathbb{R}[/itex] and [itex]\sum_ig_i = id_{\mathbb{R}}[/itex]

edit:

Opps, I didn't account for non-constant sequences. As far as I can tell, if you should want [itex]\sum_i g_i(x_i)[/itex] you would need convergence of [itex]\sum_i g_i[/itex] to a continuous linear function and convergence of the sequence [itex]\{x_i\}[/itex]. As you can see this is stepping outside of just "group theory" very quickly. Perhaps there is some algebraic-only view on this, but someone with more expertise would have to chime in.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K