Understanding Growth Order of Functions in Integral Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter zetafunction
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Growth
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the growth order of functions in integral equations, specifically examining the relationship between the integral equation h(x) = ∫(0 to ∞) (1/y)K(y/x)f(y) and the asymptotic behavior of f(x). It establishes that if h(x) = O(x^a) and the integral ∫(0 to ∞) (1/y)K(y)y^a exists as a positive real number, then f(x) must also satisfy f(x) = O(x^a). The transformation y/x = z leads to the expression h(x)/x^a = ∫(0 to ∞) (1/z)K(z)z^aF(xz), where F(t) = f(t)/t^a, indicating that F must remain bounded.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral equations and their properties
  • Familiarity with asymptotic notation, specifically Big O notation
  • Knowledge of kernel functions and their behavior in integrals
  • Basic calculus, particularly change of variables in integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of kernel functions in integral equations
  • Explore advanced topics in asymptotic analysis
  • Investigate the implications of bounded functions in integral equations
  • Learn about the convergence criteria for improper integrals
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, researchers in functional analysis, and students studying integral equations and asymptotic behavior of functions.

zetafunction
Messages
371
Reaction score
0
let be the integral equation

h(x)= \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{dy}{y}K(y/x)f(y)

here the kernel is always a positive , then if h(x)=O(x^{a}) and the integral


\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{dy}{y}K(y)y^{a} exists and is a positive real number then also f(x)= O(x^{a})
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zetafunction said:
let be the integral equation

h(x)= \int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{dy}{y}K(y/x)f(y)

here the kernel is always a positive , then if h(x)=O(x^{a}) and the integral


\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{dy}{y}K(y)y^{a} exists and is a positive real number then also f(x)= O(x^{a})
I'll restrict to positive x as the negative case can be tackled similarly.
With a change of variable y/x =z , we get
\frac{h(x)}{x^{a}} = \int_{0}^{\inftz} \frac{dz}{z}K(z)z^{a}F(xz)

where F(t) =f(t) /t^a. As h(x)=O(x^{a}) , the right hand side is bounded,O(1).
I don't see why F =O(1) . F could tend to infinity much slower than
K(z)z^{a -1} & the first equation could still hold.
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
888
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
670
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
456
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K