Gyroscopes for direct stabilization of aircraft

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of using large gyroscopes for direct stabilization of aircraft, specifically to control yaw, pitch, and rotation without relying on traditional aerodynamic surfaces like tails. Participants highlight that while gyroscopes can resist rotation due to conservation of angular momentum, their practical application in aircraft is limited by weight and the need for counter-rotation mechanisms. Existing technologies in spacecraft demonstrate similar principles, but the consensus is that utilizing aerodynamic forces remains more effective for aircraft stabilization.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gyroscopic principles and conservation of angular momentum
  • Familiarity with aircraft stabilization techniques and aerodynamic forces
  • Knowledge of spacecraft attitude control systems
  • Basic physics of rotational dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of gyroscopic stabilization in spacecraft and its limitations
  • Explore aerodynamic control mechanisms used in modern aircraft
  • Investigate the design and function of gyroscopic systems in marine vessels
  • Learn about the principles of moment and force couple in rotational dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, aircraft designers, and students of physics interested in stabilization techniques and the application of gyroscopic technology in aviation and other fields.

anders
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to use big gyroscopes to directly control yaw, pitch and rotation of aircraft?

Let's make the assumption that the system must be able to produce a specific moment (force couple) for an arbitrary length of time, without the power necessary to do so increasing.

An example application could be to counteract the aerodynamic pitching moment from a wing, without using a tail.

My guess is that it is impossible to achieve what I've described above, but I have no proof. (1)


If gyroscopes had the ability to simply resist rotation along rotation-vectors perpendicular to their axies of rotation, one could put a pack of three perpendicular gyroscopes in the center of the plane, and then rotate the aircraft by turning this gyro-pack around in a calculated manner.

think three pairwise perpendicular gyroscopes spinning at the same rate would just cancel out, and would show no gyroscopic effects. (2)


Can anyone prove or give a counterexample for either of statements (1) and (2)?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

They do have such devices which they use in satellites.

The reason they don't include them with aircraft is that they would have to be extremely heavy to have any sort of an effect. Like the spacecraft version, they'd only be good for a certain period of time before they have to be counter-rotated ( spacecraft utilize thrusters to de-spin their gyros).

Those two factors (and others I'm sure) simply means that utilizing the environment for attitude control is much more effective.
 
I've read one Master Thesis on gyro's directlly controling things. The thing was acctually a boat though, not a plane. It circled large amounts of water through the hull and kept a straight course for the boat in a rough sea. Its not really a gyro you'd normally think of, but its the same princle...conservation of angular momentum. It should be on file somewhere at UCDavis if you care to take a gander.

-Burg
 
A colleague of mine thought of the idea of using gyroscopes to keep an aeroplane stabilised while in vertical flight. I was wondering if such a theory would be possible and what the benefits would actually be of using gyroscopic stabilization.


J
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
13K