H2O Vibrational Transitions (molecular as opposed to election) Why ?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter karen_lorr
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the vibrational transitions of water (H2O) and its unique absorption and emission characteristics in the visible spectrum compared to other materials. Participants explore the reasons behind water's color and the role of molecular vibrations versus electronic transitions in this phenomenon.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that water's blue color is due to the selective absorption of longer wavelengths, influenced by the vibrational modes of the H2O molecules rather than electronic transitions.
  • Others argue that the energy levels and gaps between them in water molecules determine the frequencies of electromagnetic radiation absorbed or emitted, with interactions in a condensed medium affecting these processes.
  • It is noted that the visible light absorption in water is primarily due to vibrational modes, while the electrons in water absorb radiation mainly in the UV range.
  • Some participants highlight that other materials may have different configurations that allow for visible light absorption, suggesting that the specific arrangement of atoms and bonds in water is significant.
  • A later reply emphasizes the importance of energy level values and the specific nature of hydrogen bonds in water, suggesting that these factors contribute to its unique properties.
  • One participant expresses confusion about why other materials with molecular movement do not exhibit similar absorption characteristics as water, questioning the uniqueness of water's behavior.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the exact reasons for water's unique absorption characteristics. Multiple competing views and uncertainties remain regarding the influence of molecular vibrations, electronic transitions, and the specific configurations of different materials.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the discussion involves complex interactions between molecular structures and electromagnetic radiation, with limitations in fully understanding the nuances of these interactions and their implications for different substances.

karen_lorr
Messages
63
Reaction score
0
Good morning.

Yet another question ;-)

I have been looking at so many websites and I still can’t find the answer, so if anyone could give me a simple explanation, or give a link to a web page, it would be really appreciated.

Visible wavelength selective absorption/reflection.

Water is blue as the H2 selectively absorb/emit various frequencies at the lower end of the visible spectrum. But in everything else is at a MUCH smaller scale (of the electron).

I understand how electron frequencies selectively absorb / emit frequencies. But why is H2O different.

I have found many explanations of the results but none that explains the causes.

Why would virtually all other object’s electrons react to energy waves but the scale is much larger in water (where the hydrogen bonds contract, shake, expand, warp, etc) and make the H the “active” element in the absorption/emitting. (sorry can’t think of a better word than Active).

I would have thought that if other objects containing either H or O have the H or O’s electrons selectively absorb the energy then the same should be true of water. But it isn’t?

Why?

Is it the strength/relative length/configuration/etc of the hydrogen bond or something completely different?

Sorry to ask so many questions but I really am trying to understand what is the difference between water’s "colour" and virtually everything’s.

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's the energy levels and gaps between them that determine the frequency of EM that is absorbed / emitted. Although we start off by looking at the Hydrogen atom in terms of the electron energy, it's really the energy of the proton-electron pair (both charges). In the case of molecules, there are charges distributed within the molecule and it is the energy associated with re-arranging these charges that determines the frequencies of EM that will interact with them. But, in a condensed medium like liquid water, all the electrons and protons in each molecule are influenced by the charges in the nearby molecules too. This results in interaction with spectral bands rather than with just lines. In the case of water, the longer wavelengths happen to be absorbed more than the short wavelengths so the light with a long path through pure water will look blueish (i.e. white minus the redish wavelengths)
 
Drakkith said:
The energy levels of the water molecules electrons only absorb radiation in the UV range. The visible light absorption is mostly due to the vibrational modes between the 3 atoms.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_absorption_by_water
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_of_water#Intrinsic_color

Other materials do not have the same configuration as water, so their electrons may absorb energy in the visible range or not depending on the specific material.

Just referring to electrons is to miss out the important energy levels associated with the positive charges, too. That wiki link of yours, about vibrational modes, makes it clear that it is the nuclei as well as the electrons that are involved.
 
Than you all for your time and knowledge.

I "think" I have it now.

Due to "vibration" of the H2O being at the same frequency of some of the spectrum (many the shorter wavelengths - greens, yellows, reds) it is those that are absorebed.

But I stil don't understand why this would not be the case for anything with molecular movment - provideing it was within the frequency of any light hitting it.
What makes water different?

I understand that there will be multiple bonds - but isn't this the case with many "things"
 
Yebbut the devil is in the detail. It's the actual energy level values that count and hydrogen bonds in water are 'just right'. Nothing wrong with coincidences, you know! There will be other transparent substances that 'just happen' to absorb Infra Red, no doubt.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
12K
Replies
1
Views
2K